test-testslisted
Install: claude install-skill hk9890/claude-dev-tools
Empirical test-suite strength audit. Launch the audit workflow — do **not** probe the
suite inline. The workflow returns a structured report; relay it and save it to a file.
The audit temporarily mutates production code to check that tests fail, inside its own
git worktrees when the suite can run there, or in the live tree under a backup/restore
protocol when it cannot — either way every edit is reverted and integrity-checked.
Nothing is ever committed, no test is written, nothing is installed.
## Run the workflow
1. Parse `$ARGUMENTS` as `[low|medium|high|ultra] [path]`. Both optional. A leading
`low` | `medium` | `high` | `ultra` token is the **level**; everything after it is
the target path (default: the repo root — resolve a free-form description to a
directory or fall back to the root).
If no level token is given, ask with `AskUserQuestion` (header "Level"):
- `low` — the highest-churn components, a few mutants each. Quick signal.
- `medium` (recommended) — all components (capped), plus no-op and delay probes and
the two audit-wide probes (coverage-truth, unit isolation). The standard audit.
- `high` — the deepest dials, plus an adversarial pass that refutes equivalent
mutants. The trustworthy-numbers audit.
`ultra` is accepted so one depth token means the same thing across the audit
workflows, but this audit has no rung above `high` — its cost is the suite's own
runtime, not a refutation pass — so `ultra` runs the `high` dial