← ClaudeAtlas

codex-brainstormlisted

Adversarial brainstorming via Claude+Codex debate. Use when: exploring solutions, feasibility analysis, exhaustive enumeration. Not for: implementation (use feature-dev), architecture only (use codex-architect). Output: Nash equilibrium consensus + action items.
hmj1026/dhpk · ★ 1 · AI & Automation · score 77
Install: claude install-skill hmj1026/dhpk
# Codex Brainstorm Skill ## Trigger - Keywords: brainstorm, exhaust possibilities, explore solutions, deep discussion, feasibility analysis, solution exploration, Nash equilibrium ## When NOT to Use - Simple technical Q&A (answer directly) - Already have a clear solution (implement directly) - Only need code review (use `/codex-review`) ## Core Principle ``` ⚠️ Independent Research → Adversarial Debate → Nash Equilibrium ⚠️ Nash Equilibrium = Neither party can unilaterally change strategy to achieve a better outcome ``` ## Workflow | Phase | Action | Output | | ----- | ------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------- | | 1 | **Claude independent research** + analysis, forms Position A | Claude's optimal hypothesis | | 2 | **Codex independent research** + analysis, forms Position B | Codex's optimal hypothesis | | 3 | Multi-round adversarial debate, mutual attacks | Debate exchange record | | 4 | Check equilibrium, no further improvements possible | Equilibrium or divergence | | 5 | Output final report | Nash Equilibrium report | ### Phase 2: Codex Independent Research (Critical) **⚠️ Must let Codex research independently; do NOT feed Claude's analysis results ⚠️** ```typescript mcp__codex__codex({ prompt: `You are a senior architect. Conduct an **independent analysis** of the f