findings-auditlisted

# /findings-audit — Audit findings against external evidence Reality-check a project's empirical findings against external evidence the project has already collected. The audit is **asymmetric by design**: it looks for counter-evidence to load-bearing interpretations, not confirmation. Pro-evidence is over-selected (interpretations were authored having seen supportive evidence) — what tests them is contradictions. External evidence comes in two families and four source types: | Family | Source type | Typical home | Bias | |-----------|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------| | Narrative | `news` | `references/news/stories.csv` | Over-samples unusual / contested / extreme events | | Narrative | `interview` | `references/interviews/*.md` | Subject self-selection; contested-case salience | | Narrative | `court-opinion` | `references/cases/*.md` | Appellate / published-decision over-representation | | Aggregate | `aggregate-report` | `references/reports/*.pdf`, `references/cnj/` | Methodology-bound; definitional gaps | The procedure is the same in shape but **adjudication and falsification thresholds differ by type** — see §5 and §6. Two modes: - **Targeted (default).** For each finding, derive or accept a falsificati