complexity-reviewlisted

# Complexity Review ## Purpose Review implemented code for complexity that lacks a current, evidence-backed reason to exist. Reduce unjustified maintenance surface while preserving behavior, safety, compatibility, contracts, readability, operability, and useful verification. Optimize for justified simplicity, not fewer lines. Treat the review as the requested outcome. Do not implement a simplification unless the user also asks for changes. ## Review Standard Report a simplification only when the available evidence supports all of the following: - the complexity has no current responsibility or requirement - the proposed change is concrete and local enough to review - relevant behavior and contracts remain unchanged - safety, readability, diagnostics, and effective test coverage are not weakened - the removed maintenance surface justifies the change and its risk Reject code golf, speculative cleanup, and shorter code that is harder to understand. Prefer the smallest durable change that removes the unjustified surface. ## Review Method 1. Identify the supplied scope and the evidence available from the diff, snippet, nearby files, or repository. 2. Inspect the most relevant complexity surfaces and prioritize candidates with meaningful maintenance cost. 3. Test each candidate against protected behavior and contracts before recommending it. 4. Gather only the claim-specific evidence needed to establish that the change is safe. 5. Report supported findings, useful explana