debate-agentslisted

# Agent Room — Stochastic Multi-Agent Discussion *Meta — Multi-perspective panel. Spawns expert agents with distinct stances, surfaces real tradeoffs on high-stakes decisions with no clear winner, recommends a path with reasoning. Standalone or sub-routine.* **Core Question:** "What do multiple perspectives converge on — and where do they genuinely disagree?" > Why this skill, methodology, principles, when NOT to use, constraint-vs-perspective assignment: [`references/playbook.md`](references/playbook.md) [PLAYBOOK]. ## Critical Gates 1. **Right mode** — debate for trade-offs; poll for filtering hallucinations / finding consensus. Default debate. 2. **Specific problem** — Cold Start before spawning if vague. Don't spawn into ambiguity. 3. **Structured output** — POSITION/REASONING/PROPOSAL/CONCERNS (debate); ranking/recommendation/binary/scoring (poll). Freeform prose can't be aggregated. 4. **Cost** — debate 3×3 ≈ $0.30-0.50; poll 10 ≈ $0.30-0.50. Default sonnet; opus ~10× and requires explicit request. ## Quality Gate Synthesis must name real **tradeoffs** (not collapse to consensus), surface where stances **genuinely disagree**, recommend an action + reversibility cost, flag unresolved risks honestly (status → DONE_WITH_CONCERNS if no convergence). Critic auto-fails synthesis that manufactures consensus, hides outliers, or forces a tiebreaker. ## Before Starting Apply [`references/_shared/before-starting-check.md`](references/_shared/before-starting-check.md) [PLA