linkedin-infographic-reviewlisted

# LinkedIn Infographic Review ## Purpose Run a focused pre-publish critique on an existing LinkedIn infographic. Diagnose what is blocking publication, separate required fixes from optional polish, and avoid turning review into an unrelated redesign. ## Inputs Use the finished HTML, GIF, PNG, screenshots, caption, source material, or evidence the user provides. If evidence required to validate a factual claim is unavailable, mark that claim as unverified instead of inventing support. ## Review order ### 1. Static composition Inspect the full artboard before looking at small details. Check: - one dominant visual anchor is obvious within two seconds - the page has a clear macro rhythm from hook to visual relationship to takeaway - the composition is not top-heavy - there is no unexplained dead zone near the footer - the footer belongs to the composition instead of floating far below it - text remains readable at feed scale - copy density is solved through hierarchy and editing rather than tiny type For a 1080x1350 artboard, treat an unexplained vertical gap greater than 120px between the main composition and footer/takeaway as a blocking warning unless negative space has an intentional visual job. ### 2. Component grammar Reject generic component patterns when they replace art direction. Check: - no more than two bordered containment levels - repeated cards exist only when repetition is meaningful - pills, badges, status chips, and tiny uppercase labels have sema