← ClaudeAtlas

recursive-10-10-product-hardeninglisted

Use when asked to harden a product to verified 10/10 by first deriving its expected behavior FROM the code and then closing the gap between what the code does and what it should do — inventory every feature, write each feature's code-grounded expected behavior into a canonical behavior-spec workbook, dogfood it in a browser, fix the defects at the source, and loop test→fix→retest until every feature is evidence-verified. Triggers on "harden to 10/10", "drive it to verified 10/10", "behavior spec from the code", "derive expected behavior from the code", "spec the product from its code", "production-hardening pass", "dogfood and fix to 10/10", "build a behavior/feature workbook and verify every row". Also triggers with an auto-merge argument ("$recursive-10-10-product-hardening auto-merge", "with auto-merge") which lands each verified batch to master behind green checks. NOT for read-only scoring or gap-analysis (use coverage-matrix), a single-change QA pass (/qa or /ux), or auto-merging the whole coverage matr
jackneil/claude-jacked · ★ 1 · Testing & QA · score 67
Install: claude install-skill jackneil/claude-jacked
# Recursive 10/10 Product Hardening Drive a product from current reality to **evidence-backed 10/10** by deriving a behavior spec *from the code*, then continuously dogfooding, fixing, and re-verifying the gap between what the code actually does and what it should do. The output is not a cleaner UI or a report — it is a **known-good product state plus a current behavior-spec workbook** that maps every feature to the evidence proving it works. **Why a code-derived behavior spec, not a checklist:** a checklist tests what someone *remembered* to write down; a code-derived spec tests what the product *actually claims to do*, feature by feature, traced back to the source. The gap between "the code has a path for this" and "a real persona can complete it, verified" is where products quietly fail — and that gap is exactly what this skill catalogs, then closes. ## Core rule Do not claim 10/10 from inspection, intent, wording, or partial tests. Claim it only when the current code, the behavior-spec workbook, browser evidence, and automated test results **all agree**. **Success is shown as evidence, never asserted** — never report a row Verified without the supporting output. ## When to use - You want a product driven to genuine, defensible 10/10 — not flagged, *fixed and proven*. - You need a canonical, code-grounded behavior spec: every feature → its expected behavior from the source → tested → fixed → verified. - You want an autonomous test→fix→retest loop that keeps going unt