thermo-nuclear-code-quality-reviewlisted

# Thermo-Nuclear Code Quality Review Use this skill for an unusually strict review focused on implementation quality, maintainability, abstraction quality, and codebase health. Above all, this skill should push the reviewer to be **ambitious** about code structure. Do not merely identify local cleanup opportunities. Actively search for "code judo" moves: restructurings that preserve behavior while making the implementation dramatically simpler, smaller, more direct, and more elegant. For Codex usage, apply this to whatever review target the user gives: current local diff, target commit range, current branch's changes, arbitrary files/directories, specific symbols, or pasted blocks of code. The target does not need to be newly changed, dirty, or tied to a commit. When no target is specified, default to the current local diff. Respect the repo's existing review conventions and avoid editing code during the review unless the user explicitly asks for fixes. ## Core Prompt Start from this baseline: > Perform a deep code quality audit of the current branch's changes. > Rethink how to structure / implement the changes to meaningfully improve code quality without impacting behavior. > Work to improve abstractions, modularity, reduce Spaghetti code, improve succinctness and legibility. > Be ambitious, if there is a clear path to improving the implementation that involves restructuring some of the codebase, go for it. > Be extremely thorough and rigorous. Measure twice, cut once.