validate-quality-config

Solid

Validate consistency across quality configuration files. Use after setup-git-hooks, when debugging "works locally, fails in CI" issues, before major releases, or when onboarding.

Code & Development 15 stars 0 forks Updated 1 weeks ago MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 81/100

Stars 20%
40
Recency 20%
90
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
80
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Validate Quality Configuration Validate consistency across quality configuration files. ## When to Use - After running `setup-git-hooks` skill - When debugging "works locally, fails in CI" issues - Before major releases or audits - When onboarding to understand quality setup - After updating any quality-related configuration ## What It Validates The consistency chain: ``` docs/reference/quality-configuration.md ← Single source of truth ↓ must match .editorconfig ← Editor formatting ↓ must match Linter configs ← Code analysis ↓ must match .pre-commit-config.yaml ← Local hooks ↓ must match .github/workflows/*.yml ← CI pipeline .gitlab-ci.yml ``` Plus one axis that is *not* a match but a required **difference**: ``` Language manifest → toolchain FLOOR (go.mod, Cargo.toml, pyproject.toml, package.json, mix.exs) CI config → toolchain BUILD (go-version:, python-version:, node-version:, matrix) these must NOT be the same value ``` **Also validated**: that the toolchain **floor** (language manifest) and **build version** (CI) are deliberately *different*, and that only the floor-compatibility job reads the manifest. This is the one assertion in this skill that checks a difference rather than a match. ## Required Inputs - A project that already has quality configuration in place (run `setup-git-hooks` first) - `d...

Details

Author
jrjsmrtn
Repository
jrjsmrtn/project-orchestration-skills
Created
8 months ago
Last Updated
1 weeks ago
Language
N/A
License
MIT

Integrates with

Bundled in these plugins

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

Testing & QA Featured

test-quality

Apply test quality principles when generating or reviewing test code. Enforces Arrange-Act-Assert structure, one behavior per test, assertion quality, test isolation, meaningful naming, and test data management. Use when writing tests, reviewing test code, or when the user mentions 'write tests', 'test this', 'test quality', 'test review', 'improve tests', or 'test structure'. Loaded automatically by the code-generating molecules (code-forge, refactor-safely, bug-fix). This skill governs the craft of writing individual test cases -- not what to test (that is driven by the code being implemented) but how to write tests that are reliable, readable, and maintainable.

190 Updated 4 days ago
techygarg
DevOps & Infrastructure Listed

fhir-ci-quality

Generate or review FHIR validator CI workflows and derive candidate healthcare data-quality rules from local FHIR examples. Use when the user asks to add FHIR validation to GitHub Actions or another CI/CD system, create conformance quality gates, infer project conventions, or turn recurring validation expectations into reviewed automation.

3 Updated yesterday
ClaudeRegistry
Web & Frontend Featured

requirement-quality

Apply requirement quality principles when generating or validating feature specifications. Enforces feature completeness, scenario structure, AC verifiability, feature independence, and implementation slice quality. Use when writing feature specs, validating existing requirements, or when the user mentions 'validate this spec', 'check this feature', 'requirement quality', 'is this spec complete', or 'requirement-quality'. This skill governs the craft of writing individual feature specifications — not technical design (see design-blueprint), not implementation (see code-forge).

190 Updated 4 days ago
techygarg