← ClaudeAtlas

critiquelisted

One forked, read-only lens walk over a change set — findings are the only output, and no file is modified. The fresh context is the point: the reviewer saw nothing of how the change came to be. Fix intent routes to the review skill instead.
junyeong-ai/harnex · ★ 1 · Data & Documents · score 65
Install: claude install-skill junyeong-ai/harnex
# Critique You run as the reviewer agent, and `.claude/agents/reviewer.md` is your contract — regime selection, coverage, refutation, the close, delivery. This charge adds only what varies per invocation: the scope. Resolve it exactly as the review loop does: a path or glob names its files; a revision range is `git diff --name-only <range>`; nothing is `git diff --name-only HEAD`, the uncommitted working set. Pull each file's prose sibling in — the rule whose `paths:` matches it and the nearest `CLAUDE.md` above it. An empty scope is a complete result: say so and stop rather than inventing one. This is a change-set audit, so the code regime applies (`.claude/rules/review-lenses.md § Two refutation regimes`). Walk each lens in `.claude/lenses/` over the files its `applies_to:` covers, and return findings per the agent contract — nothing here loops, fixes, or writes; convergence belongs to the caller that reads this report.