← ClaudeAtlas

verify-concurrent-session-changeslisted

Reconstruct a git-diff equivalent by hand to verify whether a parallel session's edits to a shared, non-version-controlled folder conflict with (or resolve) your own work. Use when checking whether another agent or human session's changes to a plain-file shared resource (a personal notes tree, a shared drive, a wiki without full history) broke, contradicted, or corroborated your own recent work — self-initiated or because the user pointed you at a specific already-finished body of work to reconcile against.
justinmchoi/ai-toolkit · ★ 1 · Code & Development · score 78
Install: claude install-skill justinmchoi/ai-toolkit
# Verify Concurrent Session Changes (Shared, Non-Git Folder) Built from two dated occurrences of the same gap (2026-08-11 self-initiated concurrency check; 2026-08-12, different context — user pointed at a specific already-finished session's output to reconcile against). Clears `process-vs-work-doctrine` rule 1. Per rule 3, kept in this single-file form — no spec directory, no install script, no CONTEXT.md — until a third real use. ## Procedure ### 1. Find candidates by timestamp List files/folders in the shared tree by modification time, relative to your own last-known-good state (when you last read or wrote into that folder). This gives you the candidate set of what changed and roughly when — not proof of what changed, just where to look. ### 2. Find stale references If anything in the candidate set was renamed or moved, grep the **entire** shared tree (not just the changed files) for the old name/path. A hit means a pointer wasn't updated — something is now broken, not just "different." Do this step regardless of how thorough step 1's timestamp scan looked; renames are exactly the kind of change that looks clean by timestamp alone and broken everywhere else. ### 3. Read full content, not just confirm change For each genuinely changed or new item, read it completely. A changed timestamp only tells you *that* something changed, never *how*. Judge whether the change is additive/consistent with your own work or contradictory — and say which, explicitly, rather than rep