← ClaudeAtlas

prompt-engineeringlisted

Write, review, and optimize professional prompts for large language models. Use this skill whenever the user asks to write, draft, design, improve, fix, debug, review, or optimize a prompt, system prompt, prompt template, meta-prompt, or agent instructions; asks why a prompt "isn't working" or gives inconsistent output; asks how to prompt for a specific task (extraction, classification, generation, reasoning, tool use); or asks about prompting techniques (few-shot, chain-of-thought, XML structure, role prompting) and whether they actually work. Trigger it on casual phrasings too — "make me a prompt for X," "make this prompt better," "how should I ask the model to do Y." Assume the user may be a non-expert describing their goal in vague or lay terms; infer their intent and build the professional prompt for them, supplying the domain wording and structure they lack. Grounded in the empirical prompting literature where the evidence is strong, and honest about where guidance rests on vendor testing instead.
k-vaca/prompt-engineering-skill · ★ 4 · AI & Automation · score 72
Install: claude install-skill k-vaca/prompt-engineering-skill
# Professional Prompt Engineering Three standing rules: 1. Specify precisely, delimit unambiguously, keep patterns consistent. Phrasing tricks do not matter; these do. 2. Match technique to task type and target model. Never apply a technique by habit. 3. Treat every technique here as a hypothesis to validate on the target task. Trust an eval over this document. **Application strength.** Apply firmly and do not second-guess: few-shot non-transfer, temperature-0 limits, eval-driven iteration. Apply as a strong default and override only on eval evidence: everything in Principle 4 for reasoning models. Apply as a default and drop the moment an eval disagrees: the Anatomy section and Principles 5–8. This skill has never been measured against an eval of its own; its rules are literature- and vendor-derived, so your eval outranks it. The Anatomy section and Principles 5–8 (delimiters, placement, output contracts, agentic reminders, instruction hierarchy) are vendor-reported and unverified: apply them as defaults, drop them when an eval disagrees. Sources live in `references/evidence.md`; load it only when the user asks for sources or effect sizes. Findings verified August 2026; re-check specifics on models released later. ## Before writing: read the request, then profile the task Assume the user is a non-expert in the domain their prompt targets, until the request shows otherwise. Read their words as intent, not as a spec to preserve. When the request uses domain terms correctl