← ClaudeAtlas

cv-and-humanlisted

Tailor and polish a CV/resume - or a LinkedIn profile - to maximise its score in applicant tracking systems (ATS) and LinkedIn recruiter search, for both JD-matching and JD-less screeners. Use this whenever the user wants to optimise, tailor, rewrite, or "ATS-proof" a CV or resume, asks why their resume isn't getting past automated screening, wants a keyword/gap analysis against a job description, wants to remove AI-generated texture from / de-slop / humanize a CV or LinkedIn profile, or wants to check whether a CV parses cleanly. ALSO use for the LinkedIn PROFILE as a career document: "optimise my LinkedIn profile", "rewrite my LinkedIn headline", "my LinkedIn About section", "the experience bullets on my LinkedIn profile", "why am I not showing up in recruiter searches", "make my LinkedIn match my CV", "personal brand positioning". Trigger even with no job description, as long as the user names something to be DONE to the document - tailored, ATS-proofed, parse-checked, de-slopped. Do NOT use when the user
kevin-burns/claude-skills · ★ 7 · Data & Documents · score 78
Install: claude install-skill kevin-burns/claude-skills
# CV and Human Polish a CV so it clears automated screening while staying truthful. The strategy is grounded in the **source code** of a real LLM screener (read directly, not from commentary): ATS scoring splits into a **knowable, controllable surface** — parseability, literal keyword coverage, project links, real open-source framing, the explicit bonus triggers — and a **noisy LLM-judgment layer** you can't pin down (whether your projects are "worth" 18 vs 24 points swings run to run). Lock down the controllable surface; feed the noisy layer the strongest *true* material; never promise a score. Note that some screeners take **no job description at all** and grade against a fixed rubric — so this skill handles both JD-matching and JD-less tools. See `references/ats-mechanics.md`. ## Core principles (read before editing anything) 1. **Never fabricate.** Do not invent skills, titles, dates, employers, metrics, or open-source work. If a JD requirement is genuinely absent from the candidate's background, surface it as a gap for them to address — do not paper over it. Tailoring means truthful reframing and surfacing, not lying. This is both an integrity line and a practical one: fabrications get caught at interview and burn the candidate. 2. **Win the deterministic surface first.** Exact skill/keyword coverage and clean parseability are checklist logic — they score consistently. This is where effort reliably moves the needle. 3. **Strengthen, don't promise,