write-devnotelisted

## Procedure 1. Look at the current diff (`git diff` / `git diff --cached`) and the conversation so far. 2. Identify the one or two decisions that were not obvious from the diff alone: - An assumption got checked instead of trusted. - A simpler option was passed over for a reason. - Something turned out different from what was expected going in. Skip anything that's just "what changed" - the diff already says that. 3. If $ARGUMENTS names a specific decision, focus on only that one. 4. If nothing non-obvious happened (the change is mechanical, or the diff already speaks for itself), say so in one line instead of padding. ## Output Plain language, developer to developer - assume the reader is a peer engineer who doesn't need the mechanism re-explained, just the reasoning. No restating the diff, no hedging, no "Summary:" preamble. Print directly to the terminal, not a file. Follows `rules/adhd-output.md` in full: a single decision is a few plain sentences (nothing to chunk), more than one decision gets a plain bullet per decision so they don't run together. No bold lead-in labels ("**Option A**:") - this prints as a short terminal message, not a scanned file, and a bold prefix there reads as an AI tell. ## Rules - Say what turned out to be true and why, not what was built. - If something was verified empirically instead of assumed, that's the interesting part - lead with it. - Cut every sentence that's only there to sound complete. - Voice: first person, as th