← ClaudeAtlas

design-fundamentalslisted

Say why a design looks wrong, and what to change. Use this whenever something visual "looks off", "looks cheap", "feels amateurish", or "doesn't look professional" and the person cannot name why — and whenever someone needs colours, fonts or a layout chosen for them. Runs a measured review over colour, type, layout, grouping and hierarchy, then reports concrete fixes ranked by impact with a severity each; or turns a brief into a buildable spec — palette with hex and 60/30/10, a type pairing with real sizes off a scale, a grid. Checks the contrast maths people skip, including borders and other non-text elements (3:1), not just text (4.5:1). Scope is **print and static graphic design**: posters, flyers, packaging, labels, menus, signage, banners, book and album covers, logos and wordmarks, slide decks, social posts and thumbnails. Reach for it on phrasings like "why does this poster look cheap", "our deck cover feels amateurish", "these two brand colours fight each other", "what pairs with Montserrat ExtraBold"
labspangaea/pangaealabs-claude-plugins-marketplace · ★ 0 · Web & Frontend · score 62
Install: claude install-skill labspangaea/pangaealabs-claude-plugins-marketplace
# dkv — design fundamentals A working design-review method, checked against the literature rather than assembled from received wisdom. The theory lives in five reference files; this file decides which one you need and how to turn it into an answer. Two things make this more useful than reciting principles. First, the reference files carry the **numbers** — contrast ratios, measure, leading, scale ratios — so feedback is specific rather than "add more contrast". Second, they mark the claims that are **⚠ contested**: popular design advice contains a lot of confidently-repeated folklore, and passing it on unqualified is how you give advice that sounds authoritative and is wrong. ## The numbers, inline These come up in almost every review, so they live here rather than behind a file read. Most critiques never need to open a reference at all. | | | |---|---| | Contrast, body text | **≥ 4.5:1** · large text (18pt / 14pt bold) **≥ 3:1** | | Contrast, non-text | **≥ 3:1** — borders, focus rings, icons, chart strokes (WCAG 1.4.11). The commonly-missed one | | Colour alone | never the only carrier of meaning — always pair with label, icon, shape or position | | Typefaces | **2–3 maximum**; weights within one family are free | | Measure (line length) | **45–75 characters**, ~66 ideal; 40–60 on screen | | Leading | **120–150%** of size for body; tighter (1.0–1.2) for headlines | | Palette proportion | **60 / 30 / 10** — and the real contrast sits between the 60 and the 30 | | Type s