literature-review

Solid

Systematic literature search for theology, biblical archaeology, ancient history, and digital humanities. Triggers on "literature review on X", "Stand der Forschung zu X", "Literaturrecherche zu X". NOT for single-paper lookups — those are simple metadata queries.

Code & Development 1 stars 0 forks Updated yesterday MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 80/100

Stars 20%
10
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
80
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

## Boundary: literature-review → acquire-sources → ingest-source `literature-review` runs SEARCH — discovers candidate sources, grades them, builds a strategic guide, produces BibTeX entries. Outputs land in `input/bibliography/`. **It downloads no PDFs and creates no `knowledge/sources/*.md`.** It records each candidate's `oa_pdf` / DOI so the next phase can fetch it. **It searches the shared library *first*** (step 3) — the master bibliography grows with every project, so a new question increasingly overlaps sources you already own, and those cost nothing to "acquire". `acquire-sources` runs ACQUISITION — auto-downloads the Open-Access PDFs for the A+B set into `input/bibliography/` and writes `acquisition-todo.md`, a manual-download worklist for everything paywalled or bot-blocked. `ingest-source` runs INTAKE — takes ONE already-acquired source PDF and produces the wiki content (Source page, entities, BibTeX entry, log line). The three skills are sequential, not overlapping. A typical session: literature-review once → acquire-sources once (re-run to reconcile) → ingest-source N times. # Literature Review (Superpowers-Wrapper) This skill wraps the detailed workflow of `research-skills/dao-literature-review` (OpenAlex, IxTheo, Zenon-DAI, Propylaeum, Persée, OpenEdition, CORE, arXiv, DNB) with the research-superpowers discipline: checklist, SOFT-GATE against rushing, red-flags against "I have enough sources." **Announce at start:** "Using literature-review to build a s...

Details

Author
leiverkus
Repository
leiverkus/research-superpowers
Created
2 months ago
Last Updated
yesterday
Language
Python
License
MIT

Integrates with

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

Code & Development Solid

literature-review

Find, verify, and synthesize STEM literature across every field — from "what's the seminal paper for X" through full multi-source reviews. Treats journal articles, arXiv/preprints, and conference proceedings as first-class; grounds every claim in a retrieved source, never fabricates DOIs, checks for superseded/withdrawn/refuted work, calibrates confidence to evidence strength (including SOTA/reproduction/ablation caveats for CS and ML), and emits a tidy DOI-pinned BibTeX reference list. Pairs with the deep-researcher agent.

3 Updated today
emaballarin
AI & Automation Solid

acquire-sources

Use AFTER literature-review and BEFORE ingest-source to obtain the actual PDFs for the A+B graded sources. Auto-downloads Open-Access PDFs into the shared library (<library>/pdf/<bibkey>.pdf — the bibkey IS the filename) and writes a manual-download worklist (input/bibliography/acquisition-todo.md) for everything paywalled or bot-blocked, so the user can fetch originals via university VPN. Re-run to reconcile manually-downloaded files. Triggers on "acquire the sources", "download the literature", "get the PDFs", "Quellen beschaffen", "lade die Literatur herunter". NOT a search skill (that is literature-review), NOT an ingest skill (that is ingest-source).

1 Updated yesterday
leiverkus
Code & Development Listed

literature-review

Run a living literature review — triage papers into a review matrix (relevance tiers, KEY flags, a keep-but-flag quality checklist), keep it reconciled with Zotero/citekeys, and optionally project it into an Obsidian vault as linked, filterable notes. Use when the user wants a paper triaged into their review ("add this paper", "triage this", "does this fit"), wants a review matrix set up for a project, wants the vault notes/graph regenerated from the matrix ("update my literature notes/graph"), or asks what the review holds ("how many papers use ⟨method⟩", "which papers share ⟨theme⟩").

7 Updated 5 days ago
Shalice-in-AIland