semantic-wiki-reviewlisted

# Semantic Wiki Review `scripts/lint-wiki.py` proves the wiki is structurally well-formed: frontmatter present, wikilinks resolve, no orphans. It cannot tell you whether two source pages contradict each other, whether a synthesis still holds after a newer source was ingested, or whether a claim lacks citation backing. That work needs reading — and that is what this skill is for. **Announce at start:** "Using semantic-wiki-review to audit the wiki for content issues." Not a gate. Manual trigger only. Runs alongside the workflow, never blocks it. ## When to use - User asks: "are the wiki pages consistent?", "any contradictions?", "which synthesis pages are stale?" - After a batch of new sources was ingested and earlier syntheses may be stale. - Before promoting a `status: review` page to `status: stable`. - As a recurring sanity pass (monthly, before manuscript submission). **NOT for:** structural lint (use `wiki-lint`), single-page proofreading, or fact-checking against external sources (that is a literature task). ## Scope Pick a scope before reading — full wiki audit is expensive. Defaults: | Scope | When | |-------|------| | All `status: stable` pages | Before manuscript submission | | All pages touching topic X | After ingesting a major new source on X | | All syntheses citing source Y | After source Y was substantially revised | | Recently-changed pages (last N days) | Periodic check | State the scope to the user before reading. ## Checklist 1. **Determine s