formal-doc-structure

Solid

Draft, revise, or restructure formal internal business documents in Traditional Chinese (Taiwan corporate / financial-institution usage) — 簽呈, 會議紀錄, 評估報告, 專案規劃, 採購與廠商溝通, 對主管簡報, 驗收與交付, 跨單位協調. Picks a reader-driven structure per document type and produces a usable draft, not just advice. Trigger when the user asks to write or fix an internal business document, memo, report, meeting record, plan, or vendor communication. Do NOT invoke for RFP / 招標規格 / 需求規格書 (use rfp-writing), for pure language cleanup with no structural work (use avoid-ai-writing / clean-ai-writing), or for casual chat, creative writing, marketing copy, or code comments.

API & Backend 0 stars 0 forks Updated today MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 78/100

Stars 20%
0
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
80
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Formal Internal Document Structure Produce internal business documents that help a reader decide, approve, assign work, review risk, brief management, communicate with a vendor, or verify completion. The output is a usable draft — complete sections that paste straight into a document — not a critique. ## Output Language Match the language of the user's request, and apply it to *all* user-facing output — option labels, generated-document headings, table column names — not just prose. If the user explicitly asks for another language, that wins. Language follows the request, not the source material. When the user writes in Chinese but the uploaded document, code, or reference is in English, output stays Chinese. If the request is in Chinese, use Traditional Chinese (Taiwan business usage) and keep established technical terms in English. The English in this file is structural labelling for you, not literal output. Never mirror this file's language into your response. ## When to use Use when the request names one of these artifacts (or a clear equivalent): - 簽呈與核准文件, 經費 / 人力 / 資源申請 - 會議紀錄 (內部、廠商、審查) - 專案規劃 / 執行計畫, 組織與人力規劃, 訓練與培育文件 - 需求文件, 評估報告, 風險說明 - 採購與廠商溝通文件 (詢問、澄清、合作範圍) - 制度 / 流程 / 作業規範, 問題追蹤與改善報告, 驗收與交付文件 - 對主管簡報文字, 對外回覆稿, 跨單位協調材料 ## When NOT to use Each of these has conventions that conflict with internal-business-doc rules: - **RFP / 招標規格 / 需求規格書 / 投標 issuer specs** → use `rfp-writing`. That skill governs documents sent out for bidding; this one governs docume...

Details

Author
leoluyi
Repository
leoluyi/skills
Created
3 months ago
Last Updated
today
Language
Python
License
MIT

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

AI & Automation Solid

rfp-writing

Write or review technical RFP documents from the issuer's perspective in Traditional Chinese (需求規格書 / 需求規劃書 / 招標規格), enforcing structural rules for redundancy elimination, appendix bloat, thin-section consolidation, and formal plain-language style. Trigger only when the user explicitly asks for an RFP; do not invoke for migration plans, runbooks, ADR/ARB, design docs, meeting minutes, vendor-side bid proposals (投標提案 / RFP responses), or general formal Chinese writing — those conventions conflict with RFP rules.

0 Updated today
leoluyi
AI & Automation Solid

knowledge-doc-writing

把自學或研究一個技術主題的成果,整理成一份包含四個清楚分離 Diátaxis 區塊的知識文件——tutorial(帶著上手)、 how-to(照著完成任務)、reference(查參數與結構)、explanation(What/Why 論述與取捨決策);用 compass 兩問把每段素材路由到對應區塊,素材撐得起才寫,撐不起的型(研究過但未實作常缺 tutorial/how-to)明列為缺口, 不捏造、不搭空殼(繁體中文為主、術語保留英文)。觸發:使用者要把對話紀錄、官方文件或原始資料、或從零研究的主題 (強制查一手來源並標 as-of 時效)消化成可長期參考的技術文件;或改寫一份既有技術文件——依意圖分流: 更新時效/��入新素材→定點修補保留原形,重整/重構→依 compass 重建四型區塊。可接在 learn-loop 之後: learn 管互動學習迴圈與親手 distillation(鐵律:distillation 是學習本身,不代寫), 本 skill 只接手 distill 完成後重新組織、補讀者上下文、套完稿檢查。不要用於:公司內部簽呈/會議紀錄/ 評估報告等行政文件(用 formal-doc-structure,即使輸入是既有文件也不因此轉入本 skill)、RFP/招標規格 (用 rfp-writing)、部落格文章(用 blog-writing-zh)、只做語言層去 AI 味不動結構(用 avoid-ai-writing-zh)、 只要口頭白話解釋不產文件(用 plain-speak)、learn 的互動學習迴圈本身(用 learn-loop)。

0 Updated today
leoluyi
Data & Documents Solid

briefing-outline

說明提綱 (briefing outline) writing — distill detailed source material into one high-altitude overview that gives each part its purpose and essence, then points down for the detail. Source count is not the point: it works over several documents or one long report (pointing down to its sections). Use when the user wants to 整理/撰寫一份說明提綱, condense one or more sources into a navigable briefing for a 主管 or 委員會, summarise a long report into a high-altitude overview that points down for detail, or re-sync an existing 提綱 after its sources changed. Do NOT invoke to author a single formal document from scratch — 簽呈/會議紀錄/報告/專案規劃 (use formal-doc-structure), for RFP / 需求規格書 / 招標規格 (use rfp-writing), for lowering one term or passage to a non-technical audience (use plain-speak), or for pure language cleanup (use avoid-ai-writing-zh). This skill sits above the source material and points down into each part.

0 Updated today
leoluyi