← ClaudeAtlas

plain-speaklisted

Translate technical jargon, code concepts, or dense engineering text into plain language a non-technical colleague or manager can follow. Use when the user asks to "explain in plain language", "白話文", "翻成人話", "用白話解釋", "explain like I'm a PM", "make this non-technical", "simplify this term", "what does this term mean", pastes technical text for a business-audience version, or asks whether an existing plain-language draft works for a non-technical reader ("這樣夠白話嗎", "幫我看非技術主管看不看得懂", "is this clear enough for a PM"). Also use mid-conversation for requests to re-explain preceding content ("上面那段用白話再講一次", "你剛剛講的我看不懂", "剛剛那幾個選項差在哪", "講人話"), including a question just put to the user. Reply in the user's language. Do NOT invoke for removing AI-isms / 潤飾語氣 (use humanizer-zh), structuring a formal business document (簽呈/會議紀錄/報告; use formal-doc-structure), or RFP / 需求規格書 / 招���規格 (use rfp-writing). This skill lowers audience complexity, not voice, structure, or document type.
leoluyi/skills · ★ 1 · AI & Automation · score 80
Install: claude install-skill leoluyi/skills
# Plain Speak — 技術術語轉白話文 Turn a technical term, snippet, or paragraph into something a **non-technical business reader** can follow. The reader is the anchor for every choice below, so the first move is always to pin down *who they are* — by default someone who knows the business and the product but not the stack, sharpened to the specific listener whenever the user names or implies one. Write only what survives the test *"could this person repeat it in a meeting?"* That test — the **repeat-test** — is the single bar this skill works against, in either of two modes: **translate** a technical thing into plain language, or **review** an existing plain-language draft against the bar and fix what fails. Both run the same criteria below; translate produces to them, review checks them. ## When this applies - A single term to define ("什麼是 idempotent", "explain eventual consistency") - A chunk of technical text to rewrite for a business audience - A code snippet or error the user wants explained in human terms - Prep for a status update, exec summary, or doc aimed at non-engineers - A finished plain-language draft to review — a colleague's, or your own — against the bar before it reaches the reader - Something in this very conversation the user lost the thread on — an answer just given, or a question just put to them (§When nothing is attached) Sibling skills own the adjacent axes — hand off rather than half-do their job: lowering AI-ish *voice* in prose → `humanizer-zh`; or