improve-ui

Solid

Audit an existing product surface against its own design evidence, identify verified UI problems, and write self-contained implementation plans for another agent. Strictly read-only on product source. Use when asked to review, refine, improve, or clean up an interface without replacing its identity; investigate design-system drift; or prepare a design handoff.

Web & Frontend 9 stars 3 forks Updated 6 days ago MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 79/100

Stars 20%
33
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
80
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Improve UI Audit one coherent product surface against the system that actually governs it. Preserve the product's identity, reuse existing owners, and prefer no finding to an unsupported one. Write plans only for changes the user selects; another agent executes them. ## Boundaries - Never modify product source. Create or edit files only under `design-plans/`. - Do not install dependencies, run formatters, commit, push, or otherwise mutate the working tree. - Do not update design documentation. Record accepted documentation changes in the plan for its executor. - Use rendered evidence only when the user provides it or explicitly requests visual inspection. - Make every plan self-contained; its executor has no context from the audit or conversation. ## 1. Select the surface Honor the user's scope. If the request is broad, select one deployable application and one coherent surface family representing a primary product task. State the selection; do not synthesize the whole repository into one product. Start from the surface's routes and layouts. Trace the rendered path through compositions, shared components, variants, resolved tokens, and styles. Do not begin with a repository-wide search for inconsistencies. A connection exists only when it is proven through rendering, imports, props, resolved configuration, CSS inheritance, or a generated artifact loaded by the surface. Shared names, similar tokens, repository proximity, and conceptual relationships do not establish a...

Details

Author
linkonai2026-kr
Repository
linkonai2026-kr/designon
Created
3 weeks ago
Last Updated
6 days ago
Language
JavaScript
License
MIT

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

AI & Automation Listed

improve-ui

Audit an existing product surface against its own design evidence, identify verified UI problems, and write self-contained implementation plans for another agent. Strictly read-only on product source. Use when asked to review, refine, improve, or clean up an interface without replacing its identity; investigate design-system drift; or prepare a design handoff.

1 Updated today
Discriminative-shoji607
Web & Frontend Listed

product-design-audit

Use when a vibe coder wants a premium, evidence-based audit of an existing product, page, or flow before or after implementation. Produces prioritized UI/UX findings and verifies authorized fixes without inventing visual evidence.

0 Updated 3 days ago
trugurpala
Web & Frontend Listed

ux-ui-audit

Perform evidence-led UX and UI audits of product screens, prototypes, live websites, mobile apps, dashboards, forms, onboarding, settings, commerce flows, AI features, and design systems. Use when asked to audit, critique, review, evaluate, diagnose, benchmark, improve, or prioritize a digital product experience, including usability, interaction design, information architecture, visual hierarchy, content, responsive behavior, accessibility, trust, perceived performance, and state completeness. Produce surgical, severity-calibrated findings with evidence, user impact, root cause, a minimal sufficient recommendation, and testable acceptance criteria. Do not use for open-ended visual ideation without an artifact to assess.

2 Updated 2 days ago
aditya-ariosity