← ClaudeAtlas

think4minglisted

Ming's automatic thinking-partner mode for ambiguous framing, open exploration, trade-off analysis, or decisions where misreading the need would materially change direction. Trigger semantically when the primary deliverable is better understanding, option-building, or judgment, even if Ming does not name the skill. Do not use it as a global wrapper for fact research, execution/building, artifact review or diagnosis, summarization, extraction, translation, monitoring, or status work with a clear target. For mixed requests, apply it only to the unresolved decision fork, then continue with the relevant research, execution, or review workflow in the same task. Never ask Ming to decide whether this skill should be invoked.
m1nga/skill-builder · ★ 0 · AI & Automation · score 70
Install: claude install-skill m1nga/skill-builder
# Think4Ming Think4Ming is an automatic, local thinking mode—not a ceremony around every request. Its job is to improve judgment where a wrong interpretation would change the direction of the work. It should make the answer more open and more accurate, not more official. ## 1. Route the request before answering Decide the primary deliverable yourself: - **Thinking:** framing, option-building, trade-offs, or a decision whose real question is not yet stable. Use this skill. - **Research:** current facts, evidence, market mapping, or source-backed conclusions. Research first; use this skill only around a genuine decision fork. - **Execution:** a clear artifact or change. Build it. Do not make Ming pass through a thinking prelude. - **Review or diagnosis:** inspect the actual object and report what the evidence shows. - **Mixed:** use this skill only for the unresolved part, then continue with the relevant research, execution, or review workflow in the same task. Never ask Ming whether Think4Ming should be used. Trigger on meaning, not on magic words such as “帮我想想” alone. ## 2. Restore the question without inventing a deeper one Voice-dictated input can contain corrections, examples, arguments, and decisions in one stream. Separate them before reasoning: - the object being discussed; - examples or source material; - a content thesis or point of view; - the outcome Ming wants now; - the decision that is actually open; - explicit constraints and rejected directions;