author-applicants-position

Solid

Drafts and reviews the clinical pharmacology applicant's-position sections of a regulatory briefing package — each position stated as a claim with its scope, the evidence that supports it, the pre-specified rule it rests on, its limitations, and its residual gaps — structured so that every position is auditable against the cited evidence and no position reads as agreed or accepted. Use this skill when someone asks to draft or review applicant's positions for a regulatory interaction, stress-test positions against their evidence, or check that every position is supported. Example: "Please to draft or review applicant's positions for a regulatory interaction, stress-test positions against their evidence." Do not use for the meeting-request letter itself, for responding to questions an agency already sent, for CTD summary content, for the question-set design, or for any request to assert that a position is agreed or will be accepted.

API & Backend 6 stars 0 forks Updated 6 days ago MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 84/100

Stars 20%
28
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
80
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Applicant's Position Authoring Draft and review the clinical pharmacology applicant's-position sections of a regulatory briefing package. Each position is stated as a claim with its scope, the evidence that supports it, the pre-specified rule it rests on, its stated limitations, and its residual gaps — structured so that every position is auditable against the cited evidence and no position reads as agreed, accepted, or endorsed by the skill. **This skill drafts and reviews positions. It never commits, never asserts that a position is agreed, never predicts what an agency will decide, and never states a commitment the regulatory owner has not approved.** ## Who this is for Clinical pharmacology leads drafting applicant positions for a Type A, B, or C meeting · CP reviewers stress-testing positions before internal review · regulatory strategy partners checking that every CP position is evidence-backed. ## When to use this skill - "Draft the applicant's positions for the CP section of the pre-NDA briefing" - "Stress-test our dose-selection position against the cited evidence" - "Check that every position in this draft is actually supported by an annex" - "Review the applicant's positions for the Type B meeting" - "Is any position contradicting what we stated last time?" ## When NOT to use this skill | Request | Why not this skill | Where it belongs | |---|---|---| | "Draft the questions we should ask the agency" | Question-set design, not position authoring | `prepare...

Details

Author
malekokour
Repository
malekokour/clinpharm-pmx-skills
Created
1 weeks ago
Last Updated
6 days ago
Language
Python
License
MIT

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

AI & Automation Solid

prepare-briefing-package-content

Drafts and reviews the clinical pharmacology portion of a regulatory briefing package — answerable questions to the agency, applicant positions with their supporting evidence, and validated annex cross-references — aligned to the public structure of clinical pharmacology review. Use this skill when someone asks to draft, structure, stress-test or QC the CP content of a briefing book or meeting package — for example "draft the clin pharm section of our pre-NDA briefing package", "which questions should we ask", or "check every position in this package is actually supported". Do not use for responding to questions an agency has already sent, for writing the meeting request itself, for CTD summary or labelling content, or for any request to decide whether a position will be accepted.

6 Updated 6 days ago
malekokour
AI & Automation Solid

prepare-position-defence-brief

Structures a clinical pharmacology position defence brief — the evidence-backed argument for a CP position the team expects to defend before an agency. Maps the position statement to its evidence chain, identifies vulnerabilities, and assembles counter-arguments with sourced data. Use when preparing a CP position for agency discussion. Do not use for drafting the position itself, for deciding the position, or for predicting what an agency will accept.

6 Updated 6 days ago
malekokour
AI & Automation Solid

prepare-assessment-aid-position

Structures the clinical pharmacology content of an assessment aid or applicant's position document — the tabulated summary an agency requests to facilitate their review. Extracts every CP claim, traces it to its source document, verifies internal consistency, and flags any position statement that crosses into a clinical or regulatory decision. Use when asked to prepare or review an assessment aid's CP section. Do not use for drafting agency responses, for meeting preparation, or for taking a position.

6 Updated 6 days ago
malekokour