document-safety-committee-decisions

Solid

Records or reviews a safety or escalation committee decision so it can be understood a year later or by an inspector. It requires the decision to name exactly one action and flags wording that permits more than one, verifies quorum against the charter rather than inferring it from attendance, keeps decision date and data cut-off as separate fields, and traces every fact in the stated basis back to the pack the committee actually saw so knowledge drawn from outside the record is flagged rather than lost. It also preserves dissent and names who verifies each condition. Use it immediately after a meeting, before filing, or to reconstruct a past decision. Example: "Please assembling the pack, for the escalation design, for agency meeting minutes." Do not use for assembling the pack, for the escalation design, for agency meeting minutes, or to make or endorse the decision.

Data & Documents 6 stars 0 forks Updated 6 days ago MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 84/100

Stars 20%
28
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
80
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Safety committee decision documentation ## Who this is for Anyone responsible for the record of a safety or escalation committee decision — written so that a reader a year later, or an inspector, can see what was decided and on what. ## When to use this skill - Recording a committee decision immediately after the meeting. - Reviewing committee documentation for completeness before filing. - Reconstructing what a past decision rested on. - Preparing committee records for inspection or submission. - Checking that a decision's stated basis matches the pack the committee actually saw. ## When NOT to use this skill - **Assembling the pack** — use `prepare-escalation-committee-package`. - **Reviewing the escalation design** — use `review-escalation-schema`. - **Agency meeting minutes** — use `capture-meeting-minutes-and-commitments`. Different counterparty, different obligations. - **Making or endorsing the decision.** Refused. ## Operating modes | Mode | Question it answers | Minimum inputs | |---|---|---| | `CAPTURE` | Is the decision recorded completely? | decision record, pack | | `BASIS` | Does the stated basis match what the committee saw? | record, pack | | `RECONSTRUCT` | Can this decision be understood a year later? | archived record | | `INSPECTION` | Would this record withstand inspection? | record set | ## Procedure ### Phase 1 — The decision itself **Entry:** decision record located. 1. Record what was decided in terms that identify one action: proceed ...

Details

Author
malekokour
Repository
malekokour/clinpharm-pmx-skills
Created
1 weeks ago
Last Updated
6 days ago
Language
Python
License
MIT

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category