oversee-nca-dual-control-qc

# NCA dual-control oversight ## Who this is for The clinical pharmacologist accountable for an NCA deliverable produced by someone else — an internal analyst, a CRO, or a partner — who needs the independence of the check established rather than assumed. ## When to use this skill - Setting up or reviewing dual-control arrangements for an NCA deliverable. - Checking that an independent recomputation was genuinely independent. - Reviewing a CRO's QC documentation before accepting a deliverable. - Establishing what a QC pass did and did not cover. - Preparing the oversight record for a deliverable you will be accountable for. ## When NOT to use this skill - **Verifying the NCA parameters themselves** — use `verify-nca-outputs`. That skill performs the check; this one establishes whether the check was structurally sound. - **Data-handling rules** — use `review-blq-and-time-deviation-rules`. - **Bioanalytical data quality** — use `review-bioanalytical-report`. - **Accepting the deliverable.** Refused here — acceptance is the accountable human's. ## Operating modes | Mode | Question it answers | Minimum inputs | |---|---|---| | `INDEPENDENCE` | Was the second check actually independent? | QC documentation | | `SCOPE` | What did the QC cover, and what did it not? | QC documentation | | `RESOLUTION` | How were discrepancies resolved, and by whom? | QC records, discrepancy log | | `RECORD` | Is the oversight defensible in reconstruction? | full QC package | ## Procedure ###...