← ClaudeAtlas

review-codelisted

Code quality review - security, logic, performance, maintainability. Use for reviewing code changes like bug fixes, features, refactors, scripts.
mayankmankhand/llm-peer-review · ★ 7 · AI & Automation · score 74
Install: claude install-skill mayankmankhand/llm-peer-review
# Code Review Be thorough but concise. **Use this when:** Reviewing code changes - bug fixes, new features, refactors, scripts. **Don't use this when:** Testing a running web app (/review-browser), reviewing slash command prompts (/review-commands), checking plan completion (/review-plan), evaluating UX (/review-ux), or doing a pre-release check (/review-full). ## Critical Rules <rules> 1. **THE REVIEW PHASE REPORTS ONLY** - Reviewing never edits files; findings are its product. After the report, the same run continues into the auto loop (rule 2), which is what applies fixes 2. **Audit, then auto-fix, with pages** - Code findings are audited before the report per M2 in `.claude/skills/shared/hitl-loop.md`, so the report shows survivors only plus an Audited out log for the kills. They do not then wait for a human "fix it": after the report, survivors are auto-fixed and re-verified, and each finding exits as page, digest, or log per `.claude/skills/shared/hitl-loop.md` (pages only per M1; saying "report only" keeps a run report-first, M10) 3. **Explain simply** - Use plain English, avoid jargon </rules> ## How to Review <procedure> Read the changed files. Then pick one of two modes: **Small change** (1-2 files): Review in a single pass. No sub-agents needed. **Bigger change** (3+ files or significant logic): when running this skill **directly** (a subagent dispatched by /review is always single-pass - subagents cannot spawn sub-agents), run four focused sub-agents in