council

Solid

Second-opinion advisor. Default roster is Kimi k3 alongside Claude's own view; Gemini and Grok are opt-in via --gemini / --grok / --all. Two modes: independent (the models see the problem only, reason fresh) and critique (they stress-test a draft). Distinct from /deep-think (Claude reasoning structured, alone) and /odin (Claude + the curated knowledge brain). Trigger when the user says: "council", "/council", "second opinion on", "consult the council", "what would Gemini/Grok/Kimi say about", "stress-test this with Gemini/Grok/Kimi", "council vote".

AI & Automation 11 stars 1 forks Updated 2 days ago Apache-2.0

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 82/100

Stars 20%
36
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Council - Independent Second Opinions (Kimi k3 by default; Gemini + Grok opt-in) Independent second opinions dispatched in parallel. Use when: - The user wants fresh views on a hard call (independent mode) - The user wants a draft stress-tested before it ships (critique mode) This skill is distinct from `/deep-think` (Claude reasoning harder, alone) and `/odin` (Claude + the curated knowledge brain). The unique value is a model with a different training pedigree, different RLHF, and different failure modes reaching the question independently. Agreement is stronger evidence, and disagreement is itself information. `--all` restores the three-model roster when breadth matters more than latency. --- ## Phase 0 - Determine mode Read the user's request. CRITIQUE mode if any of: - The user passed `--critique` - The user said "stress-test this", "critique this draft", "find flaws in", "what's wrong with this", "review this draft" - The user pasted a draft (proposal, message, claim) and asked for review INDEPENDENT mode otherwise (default). --- ## Phase 1 - Gather inputs For INDEPENDENT mode, prepare: - `question`: the user's question, cleaned and concrete - `context`: facts the user has shared in this conversation that bear on the question. Important: include the FACTS (numbers, names, dates, constraints), NOT Claude's reasoning or proposed answer. The whole point of independent mode is to give Gemini a clean slate. For CRITIQUE mode, prepare: - `draft`: the exact draft ...

Details

Author
mishahanin
Repository
mishahanin/heading-os
Created
2 months ago
Last Updated
2 days ago
Language
Python
License
Apache-2.0

Integrates with

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

AI & Automation Solid

council

Gathers N independent, decorrelated perspectives across model families (external CLIs when present, subagents when not) and arbitrates inline. Use when a decision needs genuine debate — not same-model echo — for critique, review, or judge calls. Honest about degradation: never claims 'consensus' from a single model family.

86 Updated 3 weeks ago
Rune-kit
AI & Automation Listed

council

Stress-tests a decision, chooses between competing options, or produces a peer-critiqued best answer — using five separate advisor workstreams on deliberately decorrelated models, a framing-minimized synthesis, an adversarial red-team pass, and an evidence-weighted verdict. Use whenever the user wants something challenged rather than confirmed: a plan, strategy, purchase, architecture choice, hiring call, or a conclusion they already reached. Trigger: 'ask the council', 'council', 'stress-test this', 'poke holes in this', 'what am I missing', 'talk me out of this', 'A or B?'.

0 Updated 3 weeks ago
smplx-c
AI & Automation Listed

council

Five independent critic subagents in parallel on an idea, plan, design, R&R strategy, grant, or SKILL.md, then a synthesis pass that ranks findings by how much of the argument rests on them, never by vote count. TRIGGER on "council", "spawn critics", "parallel critique", "kitchen cabinet", "panel review", "stress-test this", "poke holes in this", "what would five experts say". A complete manuscript goes to review-paper.

13 Updated 5 days ago
ericluo04