council
SolidSecond-opinion advisor. Default roster is Kimi k3 alongside Claude's own view; Gemini and Grok are opt-in via --gemini / --grok / --all. Two modes: independent (the models see the problem only, reason fresh) and critique (they stress-test a draft). Distinct from /deep-think (Claude reasoning structured, alone) and /odin (Claude + the curated knowledge brain). Trigger when the user says: "council", "/council", "second opinion on", "consult the council", "what would Gemini/Grok/Kimi say about", "stress-test this with Gemini/Grok/Kimi", "council vote".
Install
Quality Score: 82/100
Skill Content
Details
- Author
- mishahanin
- Repository
- mishahanin/heading-os
- Created
- 2 months ago
- Last Updated
- 2 days ago
- Language
- Python
- License
- Apache-2.0
Integrates with
Similar Skills
Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category
council
Gathers N independent, decorrelated perspectives across model families (external CLIs when present, subagents when not) and arbitrates inline. Use when a decision needs genuine debate — not same-model echo — for critique, review, or judge calls. Honest about degradation: never claims 'consensus' from a single model family.
council
Stress-tests a decision, chooses between competing options, or produces a peer-critiqued best answer — using five separate advisor workstreams on deliberately decorrelated models, a framing-minimized synthesis, an adversarial red-team pass, and an evidence-weighted verdict. Use whenever the user wants something challenged rather than confirmed: a plan, strategy, purchase, architecture choice, hiring call, or a conclusion they already reached. Trigger: 'ask the council', 'council', 'stress-test this', 'poke holes in this', 'what am I missing', 'talk me out of this', 'A or B?'.
council
Five independent critic subagents in parallel on an idea, plan, design, R&R strategy, grant, or SKILL.md, then a synthesis pass that ranks findings by how much of the argument rests on them, never by vote count. TRIGGER on "council", "spawn critics", "parallel critique", "kitchen cabinet", "panel review", "stress-test this", "poke holes in this", "what would five experts say". A complete manuscript goes to review-paper.