devil
SolidForce N contrarian critique points against a target position. Each point carries a severity tag (BLOCKER / HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW) and a committed paragraph attacking from a distinct angle. Target is either inline (`/devil 5: <claim>`) or walked back to the latest substantive decision/claim in conversation. Manual sycophancy-breaker. Cheap alternative to /council (external) and /scrutinize (multi-phase). Single-shot per invocation. Default N=5, valid range 1-10. Honesty floor: stops early rather than fabricate weak points to hit N.
Install
Quality Score: 82/100
Skill Content
Details
- Author
- mishahanin
- Repository
- mishahanin/heading-os
- Created
- 2 months ago
- Last Updated
- 2 days ago
- Language
- Python
- License
- Apache-2.0
Integrates with
Similar Skills
Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category
devils-advocate
Pressure-tests a plan, decision, opinion, or recommendation by arguing the strongest real case against it. Use whenever the user explicitly asks to "play devil's advocate," "poke holes in this," "stress-test this," "argue against this," "steelman the other side," "tell me why I'm wrong," or invokes /devils-advocate — and also when a user states a specific decision or plan they're about to commit to and asks for a gut check. Do NOT use for casual conversation, factual questions, or a single opinion with no decision attached. Do NOT auto-trigger on emotionally loaded topics (grief, relationships, mental health, decisions the user has already made peace with) unless explicitly asked. Never overrides Claude's standard content and safety boundaries.
devils-advocate
Get an outside-Anthropic second opinion on any piece of work by sending it to Google Gemini with an adversarial critique prompt. Use when the user wants to pressure-test a decision, plan, assumption, blog draft, landing page, positioning statement, campaign, or chunk of code with a non-Claude model. Trigger when the user says 'devil's advocate,' 'play devil's advocate,' 'poke holes,' 'stress test this,' 'second opinion,' 'outside perspective,' 'non-Anthropic read,' 'sanity check from another model,' 'challenge this,' 'critique this from outside,' or '/devils-advocate.' This is explicitly a cross-model sanity check — do NOT substitute your own critique; the whole point is to surface blind spots Claude might share.
devil-advocate
Use when about to commit to a decision, plan, conclusion, or recommendation and it needs to be attacked before anyone acts on it — especially when everyone already agrees, money or time is already sunk, a deadline is pushing toward yes, or the user says "poke holes", "stress test", "red team", "what am I missing".