codex-discusslisted

Iterative non-code discussion between the local agent and Codex CLI on any open-ended topic: diet, fitness, writing, decisions, strategy, study plans, life choices, brainstorming. Orchestrates an automatic back-and-forth debate where both agents critique, propose alternatives, and iterate on the user's idea until reaching consensus. Codex CLI runs READ-ONLY, forms its own opinions, and normally does not navigate the filesystem unless the user provides file paths. Use when the user says discuss with codex, iterate with codex, consult codex, debate with codex, ask codex for a second opinion, get codex's take, or brainstorm with codex, including pasting or describing a plan, draft, idea, decision, or proposal and wanting a critical iterative review. Does NOT trigger on code review, plan-mode review of implementation plans, architecture discussions, or any technical software-engineering analysis; use codex-review for those.
mryll/skills · ★ 4 · AI & Automation · score 78

Install: claude install-skill mryll/skills

# Codex Discuss — Iterative Non-Code Consensus Skill Orchestrate an iterative debate between the local agent and Codex CLI on any non-code topic — diet, fitness, writing, decisions, strategy, brainstorming, or anything open-ended — until both reach consensus. **Guiding principle: Simplicity + evidence-first.** The simplest proposal that fits the user's evidence and stated assumptions wins. Added complexity must be justified by concrete benefit, not "just in case." Both sides should challenge each other to keep proposals lean and grounded. ## Codex Independence Codex is an **independent contributor**, not a yes-man. Do NOT load Codex with the local agent's pre-formed conclusions or framing. Codex should form its own opinions based on the topic and content provided. - **The local agent** forms its own critical reading and proposals, kept internal until round 2 - **Codex** weighs in with its own reasoning — it may agree, partially agree, disagree, or surface considerations the local agent missed - **When they disagree**: each side argues on merits with concrete reasoning (evidence, trade-off analysis, examples, counter-examples). The debate resolves on substance, not deference. - **If truly unresolved**: flag it explicitly so the user decides Give Codex only what it needs: the topic content, the user's stated goal, and any constraints — not a rubric of "the right answer." ## Codex CLI Configuration - **Model & reasoning effort**: NOT hardcoded — Codex CLI reads them from