stuck

Solid

Diagnoses a broken course setup by reading the folder, so the student never has to describe the problem in English. Takes no argument. Reports which class they are on and which files are filled, then names one blocker and one fix: Claude Code opened at the wrong level, .claude/skills/ missing, skills not loading because the trust question was never answered, a file whose scaffolding was deleted before it was filled, work going into an answer-key .example.md, an unfilled YOUR TURN, a skill run before the files it reads were filled, or a hunt for a file no skill creates. When it cannot tell, it writes the group-chat message for the student. Use whenever a student says they are stuck, confused, blocked, or that something is not working.

AI & Automation 26 stars 7 forks Updated today MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 82/100

Stars 20%
48
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
80
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

The student typed `/stuck` and nothing else. That is the whole input, and it is deliberate. Do not ask them what is wrong. Do not ask them to describe the problem, paste an error, or say which step they are on. Most of this room reads and writes English as a second language, and having to explain a broken setup in English is the thing that stops people asking for help at all. So you look at the folder, work it out, and tell them what you found. Create no file. This skill writes nothing to disk unless the fix itself is a file change and the student says yes to it first. ## The one rule **Name one blocker and one fix. Then stop.** A student running this is already lost. A list of eight possibilities asks them to triage, and triage is the thing they cannot do right now. So walk the chain below in order, stop at the first check that fires, and say only that. Once they tell you it is fixed, run the chain again from the top and give them the next one. ## Step 1. Read before you speak Look at all of this before you write a single sentence: 1. Which folder you are open in. Does it hold `CLAUDE.md`, `principles/`, `projects/`, `skills/` and `career-vault/`? Or does it hold `context.md` and `claude-contract.md`, which means you are inside one project folder. 2. Whether `.claude/skills/` exists at the course-folder root, and how many command folders sit inside it. 3. Which folder inside `projects/` is theirs. A folder that is not `edubridge` and not `_new-client` is theirs. If ...

Details

Author
mshadmanrahman
Repository
mshadmanrahman/claude-for-designers
Created
2 months ago
Last Updated
today
Language
HTML
License
MIT

Integrates with

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

AI & Automation Solid

get-unstuck

Pause, surface the current plan + open questions, and suggest the next concrete step so the agent (or operator) can recover from a deadlock or analysis paralysis.

2 Updated 3 days ago
CocoRoF
Data & Documents Listed

stud

{{ ƔƔƔ }} Plan a non-trivial feature by interviewing to resolve unknowns, then studding every function as a runnable walking-skeleton (fake data, real wiring) so names, placement, and contracts can be reviewed before any real logic is written. Stops for review; fill is a separate pass.

5 Updated yesterday
JasonWarrenUK
Code & Development Featured

pairing

Build work collaboratively in reviewable pieces, handing each piece back for review before starting the next, so the person stays in the lead and steers while the work happens instead of reviewing a finished result. Use when someone says to pair with them on something, asks to collaborate rather than direct, wants to review as it goes, or wants to guide the work piece by piece — on code, on a design decision, or on writing. For a test-first build it runs tdd, for restructuring it runs refactor, for an interface contract it runs design-an-api, and for plan work it runs iterative-plan-review or plan-implementation, each collaboratively; invoke any of those directly instead to run it straight through without pausing. Does not pace someone through code that already exists and builds nothing — use code-walkthrough. Does not explain, summarize, or research something instead of producing it — use code-overview or research.

224 Updated today
testdouble