wiki-reviewlisted

# Review the wiki Say what is wrong with the wiki, with evidence, and change nothing. Two depths: the **quick** review reads tool reports and no pages, so it costs little and can run often; the **deep** review reads pages, through workers, and judges what code cannot: whether a claim is right, current, supported, and consistent. Fixing is `wiki-edit`'s, for the findings the user picks. Tools: `status`, `lint`, `overlap`. Reads [provenance.md](../wiki/references/provenance.md) for the deep review. Choose the depth from the request: "lint", "health", "quick" mean quick; "deep", "mistakes", "gaps", "contradictions", "is it right" mean deep. When unclear, run the quick review and offer the deep one. ## Quick review 1. Call `status`, then `lint`, then `overlap` with `within: true` (and, in a hub, `member` set to this project's own name, so the mirrors' own duplicates stay the members' business). 2. Report from the tools alone, grouped by what the user loses: - **Broken navigation**: dead links, stale index entries, ambiguous links and duplicate basenames, with path and line. - **Unreachable pages**: orphans, and pages no index or map lists. - **Duplicates**: `overlap`'s `duplicate` pairs inside this wiki, with their scores and shared terms; the open `related` pairs only when their content score is high. A settled pair is one page linking the other, such as a page and the source it cites: leave it out. - **Weak evidence**: lint's `uncited`