grant-reviewerlisted

Multi-agent grant reviewer producing scored critiques and copy/paste-ready edits to maximize funding probability. Triggers on: 'review my grant,' 'grant review,' 'score my aims,' 'NIH review,' 'study section,' 'pink sheet,' 'edit my R01/R21/K08/K23/R03/U01,' 'strengthen my aims,' 'resubmission,' 'mock study section,' or any request to evaluate a research grant. Mechanism-adaptive: R-series use the NIH Simplified Review Framework (Factor 1/2/3); K-series score the five K criteria (Candidate, Career Development Plan, Research Plan, Mentors, Environment). Also DoD CDMRP, PCORI, AHRQ, foundations. Nine agents: Storyboard, Rigor, Stats, Payoff Aim, Compliance, Positioning, conditionally Inclusion, Budget, and Career Development (K). Phase 2.5 Cross-Check, Phase 3.5 Edit Verification, Phase 4 two-phase Study Section, Phase 4.5 Reviewer-2 Steelman; depth modes pink/red/gold. Outputs: scored edit bank, study-section transcript, .docx pink sheet. Trigger even for 'look at my grant.'
neelshah4/claude-grant-reviewer · ★ 0 · AI & Automation · score 73

Install: claude install-skill neelshah4/claude-grant-reviewer

# Multi-Agent Grant Reviewer & Score Optimizer ## Overview Up to **nine specialized reviewer agents** run (in parallel where the Agent tool is available), each adopting a distinct persona and reviewing the full grant through their lens. Six core agents always run; three fire conditionally. A synthesizer phase merges all outputs into a prioritized edit bank, score forecast, and executive brief. An **Edit Verification Loop** tests the top edits before they ship; a three-reviewer **Study Section** simulation with two-phase (preliminary → post-discussion) scoring debates the consensus; a **Reviewer-2 Steelman** convergence test closes it. Output: chat summary + downloadable `.docx` pink sheet. **Mechanism-adaptive scoring.** For NIH Research Project Grants (R01/R21/R03/U01/DP, due dates ≥ Jan 25, 2025) the **Simplified Review Framework** governs (Factor 1 / Factor 2 / Factor 3). For **K-series** — which are NOT in the SRF — the panel scores the **five K criteria** (Candidate; Career Development Plan/Career Goals and Objectives; Research Plan; Mentor(s)/Co-Mentor(s)/Consultant(s)/Collaborator(s); Environment & Institutional Commitment to the Candidate), each 1–9, holistic Overall Impact. Verify the review framework applies to the mechanism before scoring — see `references/scoring-frameworks.md`. **Depth modes** (one Phase-0 question; the script takes `args.depth`): **Pink** (early draft — story/structure, Agents 1+6 + aims checklist), **Red** (full panel, default), **Gold** (f