mkadvise
SolidTurn a raw idea into ONE honest recommendation: interview one question at a time until the problem, requirements, goals, non-goals, and constraints are CONFIRMED, then deliver a single verdict — do, don't, cheaper alternatives, trade-offs, ordered checklist, success metrics. Required: the user wants exactly ONE recommendation — not options, not a debate — and their framing is open to challenge (advise may answer a different question than the one asked). Triggers on "what should I do about X", "advise me on X", "am I approaching this right", "is this the right move". Do NOT use to be interrogated with no recommendation (→ mk:grill) — advise also interviews one question at a time, but only to reach a verdict. Do NOT use when the framing is settled and only the options are open (→ mk:brainstorming). Do NOT use to decide whether something is worth building (→ mk:office-hours). Do NOT use when you want several perspectives to argue it out (→ mk:party).
Install
Quality Score: 81/100
Skill Content
Details
- Author
- ngocsangyem
- Repository
- ngocsangyem/MeowKit
- Created
- 5 months ago
- Last Updated
- 1 months ago
- Language
- TypeScript
- License
- MIT
Integrates with
Bundled in these plugins
Similar Skills
Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category
advise-project-approach
Research and advise how a software project should be built — stack selection, architecture, operating-cost tradeoffs, and real-world comparables. Use on `/advise-project-approach` or when asked for project strategy, stack choice, or an architecture/repo critique.
mkgrill
Relentlessly interview the user about THEIR plan or design — one question at a time — resolving each branch of a decision tree until shared understanding. Claude is the interviewer; the user is the interviewee. Triggers on "grill me", "stress-test this plan", "get grilled on my design", "interrogate my plan". Checkpoints every answer to docs/knowledge/<slug>.md so progress survives a context-window reset. Flags knowledge the user cannot answer as a gap to chase. Do NOT use to PROPOSE solutions or compare approaches (→ mk:brainstorming). Do NOT use to validate "is this worth building?" (→ mk:office-hours). Do NOT use when Claude should ANSWER questions about the repo (→ mk:ask-me). Do NOT use for a one-shot review of an existing plan (→ mk:plan-ceo-review). Do NOT use to apply named reasoning lenses to findings (→ mk:elicit).
cf-advise
Decision advisory via structured interview — never writes code or plans. Use when the user wants help DECIDING — e.g. "should I", "is X worth it", "which approach", "help me decide between A and B", "am I overthinking this", "what would you recommend", "pros and cons of". Unlike $cf-plan (builds) or $cf-ask (looks up code), this only advises.