mkelicit

Solid

Structured second-pass reasoning after code review or plan evaluation. Offers named reasoning methods (pre-mortem, inversion, red team, Socratic, etc.) to re-examine findings through a specific lens. Use after /mk:review verdict or any time deeper analysis is needed on an existing output. NOT for initial review (see mk:review); NOT for creating implementation plans (see mk:plan-creator).

AI & Automation 15 stars 2 forks Updated today MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 86/100

Stars 20%
40
Recency 20%
100
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
50
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Elicitation — Structured Second-Pass Reasoning Re-examine an existing output (review verdict, plan, analysis) through a named reasoning method. Surfaces insights that generic "make it better" requests miss. ## When to Use - After `/mk:review` verdict — deepen analysis before Gate 2 - After plan creation — stress-test assumptions before Gate 1 - After any agent output — when user wants a specific angle of analysis - When user says "dig deeper", "what am I missing", "challenge this" **NOT this skill if:** you have no existing artifact to re-examine — use `mk:brainstorming` for open exploration, or `mk:problem-solving` for approach-stuck situations. ## Reasoning Methods | Method | Lens | Best For | | ----------------------- | ----------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------- | | **Pre-mortem** | "Assume this shipped and failed. Why?" | Risk discovery, failure mode analysis | | **Inversion** | "What would make this maximally wrong?" | Assumption testing, edge cases | | **Red Team** | "You are an attacker. How do you exploit this?" | Security analysis, adversarial thinking | | **Socratic** | "What evidence supports each claim?" | Logic validation, gap detection | | **First Principles** | "Strip assumptions. What's funda...

Details

Author
ngocsangyem
Repository
ngocsangyem/MeowKit
Created
4 months ago
Last Updated
today
Language
TypeScript
License
MIT

Bundled in these plugins

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

AI & Automation Featured

reasoning

To apply structured 8D meta-cognitive reasoning thinking to complex problems, then answer clearly with caveats. Must use when asked to think or reason.

324 Updated 2 days ago
griddynamics
AI & Automation Solid

dialectical-reasoning

Use when making any non-trivial recommendation, analysis, plan, design decision, code-review note, or architectural trade-off — before presenting to the user or acting. Forces a thesis / antithesis / synthesis pass so first-pass conclusions cannot ship without surviving their strongest counter-case.

20 Updated today
CorvinLabs
AI & Automation Solid

mkgrill

Relentlessly interview the user about THEIR plan or design — one question at a time — resolving each branch of a decision tree until shared understanding. Claude is the interviewer; the user is the interviewee. Triggers on "grill me", "stress-test this plan", "get grilled on my design", "interrogate my plan". Checkpoints every answer to docs/knowledge/<slug>.md so progress survives a context-window reset. Flags knowledge the user cannot answer as a gap to chase. Do NOT use to PROPOSE solutions or compare approaches (→ mk:brainstorming). Do NOT use to validate "is this worth building?" (→ mk:office-hours). Do NOT use when Claude should ANSWER questions about the repo (→ mk:ask-me). Do NOT use for a one-shot review of an existing plan (→ mk:plan-ceo-review). Do NOT use to apply named reasoning lenses to findings (→ mk:elicit).

15 Updated today
ngocsangyem