mkelicit
SolidStructured second-pass reasoning after code review or plan evaluation. Offers named reasoning methods (pre-mortem, inversion, red team, Socratic, etc.) to re-examine findings through a specific lens. Use after /mk:review verdict or any time deeper analysis is needed on an existing output. NOT for initial review (see mk:review); NOT for creating implementation plans (see mk:plan-creator).
Install
Quality Score: 81/100
Skill Content
Details
- Author
- ngocsangyem
- Repository
- ngocsangyem/MeowKit
- Created
- 5 months ago
- Last Updated
- 1 months ago
- Language
- TypeScript
- License
- MIT
Bundled in these plugins
Similar Skills
Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category
reasoning
To apply structured 8D meta-cognitive reasoning thinking to complex problems, then answer clearly with caveats. Must use when asked to think or reason.
sequential-thinking
Structured reasoning harness for problems where shallow thinking fails or hallucination is costly. Use whenever a question requires multi-step reasoning, involves competing hypotheses, has multiple interacting components, or carries irreversible consequences. Activate for debugging with unclear root causes, intermittent or multi-component issues, incident post-mortems, choosing between multiple valid approaches, architecture or design tradeoffs, causal chain analysis, high-stakes decisions, and any task where the first plausible answer is suspiciously easy. Provides reasoning modes (abductive, counterfactual, first-principles, inversion, and more), grounding techniques against confabulation, adversarial self-checks, root-cause playbooks, and automatic multi-approach synthesis (independent angles run in parallel and compared) — all through the `mcp__sequential-thinking__sequentialthinking` tool. Skip for trivial lookups, obvious fixes, and single-step questions.
dialectical-reasoning
Use when making any non-trivial recommendation, analysis, plan, design decision, code-review note, or architectural trade-off — before presenting to the user or acting. Forces a thesis / antithesis / synthesis pass so first-pass conclusions cannot ship without surviving their strongest counter-case.