← ClaudeAtlas

security-architecture-reviewlisted

Use when reviewing a system's security architecture — assessing control coverage, defense-in-depth layers, single points of failure, and zero-trust alignment with TOGAF/SABSA/NIST SP 800-160. Triggers on "security architecture review", "defense in depth", "control coverage", "zero trust", "north-south east-west traffic".
noctua84/nescio-ai · ★ 0 · AI & Automation · score 73
Install: claude install-skill noctua84/nescio-ai
# Security Architecture Review ## Purpose Create a security architecture review that delivers actionable, measurable results. **Category**: Cybersecurity & Information Security ## Inputs ### Required - **Objective**: What you want to achieve with this deliverable - **Context**: Relevant background information (systems, scope, environment) ### Optional - **Constraints**: Any limitations or requirements to consider - **Existing Work**: Previous documents or data to build on ## Context Before starting, read the repo's `CLAUDE.md` and any relevant notes under `memory/` (e.g. `memory/repo/<repo>/`, `memory/feedback/`) for prior decisions and constraints. ## Process ### Step 1: Context & Research - Review any existing security architecture review documents in the project - Identify key stakeholders and their requirements - Select the most appropriate framework: TOGAF Security Architecture, SABSA, NIST SP 800-160 ### Step 2: Analysis & Framework Application - Apply the selected framework to structure the security architecture review - Identify gaps, opportunities, and risks - Define success metrics: Control Coverage %, Architecture Gap Count, Defense-in-Depth Layer Score, Compliance Alignment % - Document assumptions and dependencies - Validate approach against industry best practices ### Step 3: Build the Deliverable - Structure the security architecture review using the output format below - Include specific, actionable recommendations — not generic advice - Add concre