accessibility-reviewlisted

# /accessibility-review > If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see [CONNECTORS.md](../../CONNECTORS.md). Audit a design or page for WCAG 2.1 AA accessibility compliance. ## Usage ``` /accessibility-review $ARGUMENTS ``` Audit for accessibility: @$1 ## WCAG 2.1 AA Quick Reference ### Perceivable - **1.1.1** Non-text content has alt text - **1.3.1** Info and structure conveyed semantically - **1.4.3** Contrast ratio >= 4.5:1 (normal text), >= 3:1 (large text) - **1.4.11** Non-text contrast >= 3:1 (UI components, graphics) ### Operable - **2.1.1** All functionality available via keyboard - **2.4.3** Logical focus order - **2.4.7** Visible focus indicator - **2.5.5** Touch target >= 44x44 CSS pixels ### Understandable - **3.2.1** Predictable on focus (no unexpected changes) - **3.3.1** Error identification (describe the error) - **3.3.2** Labels or instructions for inputs ### Robust - **4.1.2** Name, role, value for all UI components ## Common Issues 1. Insufficient color contrast 2. Missing form labels 3. No keyboard access to interactive elements 4. Missing alt text on meaningful images 5. Focus traps in modals 6. Missing ARIA landmarks 7. Auto-playing media without controls 8. Time limits without extension options ## Testing Approach 1. Automated scan (catches ~30% of issues) 2. Keyboard-only navigation 3. Screen reader testing (VoiceOver, NVDA) 4. Color contrast verification 5. Zoom to 200% — does layout break? ## Outpu