← ClaudeAtlas

design-critiquelisted

Get structured design feedback on usability, hierarchy, and consistency. Trigger with "review this design", "critique this mockup", "what do you think of this screen?", or when sharing a Figma link or screenshot for feedback at any stage from exploration to final polish.
nota-america/forgecat-agent-profiles · ★ 2 · AI & Automation · score 61
Install: claude install-skill nota-america/forgecat-agent-profiles
# /design-critique > If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see [CONNECTORS.md](../../CONNECTORS.md). Get structured design feedback across multiple dimensions. ## Usage ``` /design-critique $ARGUMENTS ``` Review the design: @$1 If a Figma URL is provided, pull the design from Figma. If a file is referenced, read it. Otherwise, ask the user to describe or share their design. ## What I Need From You - **The design**: Figma URL, screenshot, or detailed description - **Context**: What is this? Who is it for? What stage (exploration, refinement, final)? - **Focus** (optional): "Focus on mobile" or "Focus on the onboarding flow" ## Critique Framework ### 1. First Impression (2 seconds) - What draws the eye first? Is that correct? - What's the emotional reaction? - Is the purpose immediately clear? ### 2. Usability - Can the user accomplish their goal? - Is the navigation intuitive? - Are interactive elements obvious? - Are there unnecessary steps? ### 3. Visual Hierarchy - Is there a clear reading order? - Are the right elements emphasized? - Is whitespace used effectively? - Is typography creating the right hierarchy? ### 4. Consistency - Does it follow the design system? - Are spacing, colors, and typography consistent? - Do similar elements behave similarly? ### 5. Accessibility - Color contrast ratios - Touch target sizes - Text readability - Alternative text for images ## How to Give Feedback - **Be specific**: "The CTA