← ClaudeAtlas

showlisted

Turn code structure, changes, and verification evidence into the smallest useful visual. Use when the user invokes /show, asks what connects to what, what changed, how a flow works, or what proves a result; use for compact pseudocode, call or component trees, file maps, structural diffs, Mermaid diagrams, and evidence maps, with focused HTML only when simpler forms cannot carry the information.
ohm41321/luciazero · ★ 4 · Code & Development · score 77
Install: claude install-skill ohm41321/luciazero
# Show — make the evidence visible Answer three questions at a glance: 1. What connects to what? 2. What changed? 3. What proves it? Build an evidence view, not a decorative diagram. The view summarizes reality; source files, diffs, and command results remain the ground truth. ## 1. Set the focus Use the user's question and current task context as the input. Do not ask for details that can be discovered from the repository. Narrow broad requests to the smallest boundary that answers the question, and state that boundary. Gather only the relevant evidence: - definitions, callers, consumers, configuration, and ownership; - the current diff or before/after revisions; - verification command, exit code, shortest decisive output, and coverage gaps. Never expose private chain-of-thought. Show observable structure, evidence, and concise conclusions instead. ## 2. Normalize the evidence Reduce what was found to five kinds of information: - **Entities** — files, functions, components, services, states, or commands; - **Relations** — calls, owns, reads, writes, emits, depends on, or verifies; - **Changes** — added, removed, or modified entities and relations; - **Proof** — commands and observations that confirm or refute a claim; - **Gaps** — unknown, inferred, or unverified parts. Label inference as `? inferred`; never draw a guessed edge as fact. ## 3. Choose the smallest useful view Prefer the first form that carries the relationship clearly: | Question | View | |---|-