kwreviewlisted

<review_target> #$ARGUMENTS </review_target> # Review Two automated reviewers check your work for the errors that damage credibility: wrong strategy and wrong data. ## When to Use * After `/kw:plan` to validate a plan before executing * Before sharing a strategy doc, brief, or analysis with stakeholders * "Review this plan", "Check this brief", "Is the data right?" * Any knowledge work artifact that will be seen by decision-makers ## What Gets Reviewed The most recently produced artifact. Determined by context: | Situation | What to review | | --------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- | | `/kw:plan` just ran | The plan file it produced | | User points to a file | That file | | User pastes content | That content | | Ambiguous | Ask: "What should I review? Provide a file path or paste the content." | ## Process ### Step 1: Load the content Read the file or accept pasted content. If the content references data (metrics, conversion rates, financial figures), also load: * Any data context files referenced in the project's CLAUDE.md * Check freshness of any data files cited ### Step 2: Run both reviewers in parallel <parallel_tasks> 1. **Strategic Alignment Reviewer**