hypothesis-placement-tournamentlisted

# hypothesis-placement-tournament Goal: - Judge one placement-tournament matchup between a candidate hypothesis and one opponent. Inputs: - `research_plan/RESEARCH_PLAN.json` - two `hypotheses/<id>/HYPOTHESIS.json` artifacts with completed review bundles Outputs: - one `TournamentMatchContract` result for a placement tournament Context Loading: - Open `skills/shared-references/schema-index.md`. - Read `packages/agent_contracts/ranking.py` and confirm the exact `TournamentMatchContract` shape before emitting the placement result. - Read `research_plan/RESEARCH_PLAN.json`. - Read both hypotheses and their review bundles. - Confirm that the match strategy is `placement_tournament`. Execution Prompt Contract: - System Intent: - You are making one single-turn comparative judgment between two reviewed hypotheses. - Required Reasoning Focus: - Compare explanatory power, mechanistic quality, feasibility, and testability against the active research goal. - Prefer the hypothesis that would be more valuable to keep in the frontier. - Do Not Do: - Do not return a tie. - Do not ignore major review failures. - Output Shape: - Emit one `TournamentMatchContract`. - `match_strategy`: `placement_tournament` - `winner_id`: one of the two hypothesis IDs - `reasoning`: concise but specific Execution Steps: 1. Open `skills/shared-references/schema-index.md`, then read `packages/agent_contracts/ranking.py` before emitting the placement match artifact. 2. Compare the tw