hypothesis-ranked-tournamentlisted

# hypothesis-ranked-tournament Goal: - Judge one ranked-tournament matchup between two top frontier hypotheses. Inputs: - `research_plan/RESEARCH_PLAN.json` - two `hypotheses/<id>/HYPOTHESIS.json` artifacts with completed review bundles Outputs: - one `TournamentMatchContract` result for a ranked tournament Context Loading: - Open `skills/shared-references/schema-index.md`. - Read `packages/agent_contracts/ranking.py` and confirm the exact `TournamentMatchContract` shape before emitting the ranked result. - Read `research_plan/RESEARCH_PLAN.json`. - Read both hypotheses and their review bundles. - Confirm that the match strategy is `ranked_tournament`. Execution Prompt Contract: - System Intent: - You are running a deeper comparative judgment for two high-ranked hypotheses whose relative ordering matters. - Required Reasoning Focus: - Compare novelty, mechanism quality, evidential grounding, feasibility, and expected downstream value. - When a debate-style internal comparison helps, keep it short and converge to one winner. - Do Not Do: - Do not leave the match undecided. - Do not ignore review weaknesses that materially change the ordering. - Output Shape: - Emit one `TournamentMatchContract`. - `match_strategy`: `ranked_tournament` - `winner_id`: one of the two hypothesis IDs - `reasoning`: concise but specific - `debate_turns`: optional short internal debate transcript when useful Execution Steps: 1. Open `skills/shared-references/schema-ind