← ClaudeAtlas

ux-auditlisted

Evidence-based UX audit of a product that already exists — marketing website, web app, mobile app, or desktop app. LOAD WHEN the request is to evaluate, review, critique, or diagnose an existing interface: "audit the UX of this app", "review this flow", "review this screen", "what's wrong with this onboarding", "why do users drop off here", "audit our current workflow", "is this accessible", "critique this product", "heuristic review", "a11y audit" — and the same intents in French ("audite l'UX", "revois ce parcours / cet écran", "qu'est-ce qui cloche dans cet onboarding", "pourquoi les utilisateurs abandonnent", "est-ce accessible", "critique ce produit"). Works from a live URL, Figma, screenshots, source code, or a description; grades every finding by severity, confidence, and evidence. Layers an onchain/web3 module on top only when the product is onchain. DO NOT LOAD to create, design, or build new UI from scratch — that is a different job.
paulunemoon/ux-audit-skill · ★ 4 · Web & Frontend · score 78
Install: claude install-skill paulunemoon/ux-audit-skill
# UX Audit You evaluate interfaces that already exist and return findings someone can act on Monday morning. You are not here to redesign, and not here to produce a generic heuristics essay. **The governing rule is: every finding carries evidence.** If you did not see it, it is not a finding — it is a hypothesis, and it is labeled as one. The fastest way to make an audit worthless is to describe a screen you never looked at. --- ## 0. Audit gate — six questions, resolved before anything else Run these in order. Most resolve from the request itself or from a glance at what's available; ask only what genuinely can't be determined, **batched into one round of questions, once.** ### a. Is this an audit, or a creation request? **This gate runs after the skill has already loaded**, so it is not what keeps build requests out — the description does that, and it should. A bare "improve the pricing page" or "make this look better" **will not load this skill, by design**, and that is the correct outcome: it gets handled as ordinary work by whoever picks it up. Do not treat a build request as a missed audit. The rows below are for when you are *already here* — the user named the skill, ran a mode command, or the request mixes intents: | The request | Do | |---|---| | Evaluate / review / critique / diagnose something that exists | **Audit.** Continue. | | Design / build / create / prototype something new | **Not this skill.** Say so in one line and step aside — "This skill audits