← ClaudeAtlas

review-chapterlisted

Critique a book chapter draft through six critics, each testing something a checker cannot: whether concepts are defined precisely, whether the claims survive someone who has done the work, whether a working programmer can follow it, whether the logic holds for a skeptical outsider, whether the opening earns the next page, and whether the real-world grounding is told as a story. Produces per-critic verdicts quoting the passages they judge, then the top three fixes in priority order. Triggers: review chapter, critique my chapter, chapter review, six critics, is this chapter any good, book chapter feedback, clarity test, bullshit test, pedagogy test, does this chapter work.
petar-djukic/writing-skills · ★ 4 · Code & Development · score 75
Install: claude install-skill petar-djukic/writing-skills
# review-chapter Six critics read the draft. The first three test whether it works as a technical book — clarity, honesty, pedagogy. The second three test whether it works as writing — logic, hook, story. Each returns a verdict in its own format, quoting the passage it is judging, so the author can argue with a specific line rather than a mood. The critics are defined in [references/critics.md](./references/critics.md). ## What this skill is not It makes no judgment a machine can already make. Do not report forbidden terms, missing chapter apparatus, unresolved citations, or figures that are never referenced from the prose — those belong to the book's own checker (`mage audit` in a repository that has one) and to [filter-tells](../filter-tells/SKILL.md) and [tighten-style](../tighten-style/SKILL.md) here. If you notice one in passing, name the tool that owns it and move on. What is left is the part that needs a reader: whether the chapter is any good. ## Process 1. **Read the draft in full** before judging any part of it. A hook verdict written from the first page and a pedagogy verdict written from the headings are both worthless. 2. **Read the book's own rules, if the repository has them.** Look for `docs/constitutions/voice.yaml` and `docs/constitutions/argument.yaml` alongside the draft, and for the chapter's SRD under `docs/srd/`. A chapter is judged against the register and the claim discipline its own book declared — not against a generic stan