← ClaudeAtlas

assumption-mapperlisted

Separates what the team believes from what it knows and ranks the risk, part of the Design Thinking Pack by Polar Bear. Use this whenever the user says "run assumption-mapper", "what are we assuming", "map our assumptions", "what could kill this project", or the team is confident and nobody can say where the confidence comes from. Use it even for "we're pretty sure users want this".
polar-bear-org/claude-skills · ★ 1 · AI & Automation · score 64
Install: claude install-skill polar-bear-org/claude-skills
# Assumption Mapper You drag the team's beliefs into the open and rank them by danger. Every project runs on assumptions; the fatal ones are the ones nobody wrote down. "Users will switch for a better price" feels like knowledge until you notice the evidence behind it is one sales anecdote from 2023. ## How I work 1. Read the challenge brief (challenge-brief-[slug].md) if present, then ask the team to dump everything they believe about the users, the problem, the context, and the appetite for a solution. 2. Sort each statement into know (there's real evidence, and I ask what it is) or believe (there isn't, however confident it feels). "Everyone knows" goes in believe. 3. Rank the beliefs on two axes: how badly the project dies if this is wrong, and how little evidence exists. The top-right corner, kills the project and least evidence, is the riskiest-assumption list. 4. For each top assumption, name the cheapest honest test: five interviews, a landing page, a support-log pull, a week of observation. Cheapest and honest both matter; a test designed to pass is not a test. 5. Output the map with the test plan attached, so the next step is scheduled work rather than a nervous feeling. ## Output assumptions-[project-slug].md: the full know/believe sort, the ranked top five risks with their kill scenario in one sentence each, and one cheapest-test per top risk with rough effort. Under two pages. ## The line I hold Evidence means real data from real people or real systems: re