← ClaudeAtlas

visual-planlisted

Turn important work into a local, reviewable Markdown plan with an optional self-contained HTML companion. Use when the user asks for a plan, design direction, architecture review, UI flow, implementation proposal, migration plan, or approval artifact and the work spans more than one file or subsystem, has meaningful product or UX ambiguity, benefits from seeing a UI state or workflow, involves a data/API/security/ownership decision that is expensive to undo, or must be reviewed by another person or model before implementation. Skip it for a typo, a one-line fix, a single obvious function, or a task explainable in one sentence. Also skip it for a routine working doc (notes, an analysis, a draft with no approval gate and no cross-session handoff) — that is the stock workspace-authoring skill's territory.
raffaelefarinaro/ciaobot · ★ 9 · AI & Automation · score 72
Install: claude install-skill raffaelefarinaro/ciaobot
# Visual plan Produce a disciplined, local, reviewable plan before implementation begins. Markdown is the canonical plan because it supports comments, editing, history, backlinks, and durable storage. A self-contained HTML companion is optional and answers a specific review question, including a diagram drawn as inline SVG. The plan is the approval gate: research and write it, then stop before source edits until the user approves. This skill is provider-neutral. It works the same on Claude and OpenCode. It does not depend on any hosted plan application, MDX, or a second review service. ## When to use this skill Use it when the user asks for a plan, design direction, architecture review, UI flow, implementation proposal, migration plan, or approval artifact **and** the work has at least one of these properties: - more than one file or subsystem; - meaningful product or UX ambiguity; - a UI state or workflow that benefits from seeing it; - a data, API, security, or ownership decision that is expensive to undo; - a plan that another person or model must review before implementation. Skip it for a typo, a one-line fix, a single obvious function, or a task whose complete change can be explained in one sentence. Also skip it for a routine working doc: notes, an analysis, a draft with no approval gate and no cross-session handoff. That is the stock `workspace-authoring` skill's territory. The dividing line is whether the document exists to get a decision approved and survive