legion-reviewlisted

# Legion Review Review an open PR against its issue spec and for code quality, with findings that survived an adversarial check. The product is a structured decision -- approved or changes_requested -- recorded as a HEAD-keyed quality gate, plus file:line findings the implementer can act on without guessing. ## Inputs - The PR number (argument, or infer from the current branch via `legion pr list`). - The repo (from the working directory's watch.toml mapping). ## Procedure 1. **Load the contract.** `legion pr view --repo <repo> --number <n>` for the body and branch; `legion issue view --repo <repo> --number <n>` for the linked issue's acceptance criteria. No linked issue is itself a finding (the workflow requires one). 2. **Fan out review dimensions.** Spawn parallel review agents via the Task tool using subagent_type `legion:legion-review` (plugin agents register namespaced; the bare `legion-review` form exists only if a repo also carries a local .claude/agents copy -- check the available-agents list if the namespaced form does not resolve), one per dimension, each given the PR number, branch, issue criteria, and its single focus: - `spec`: acceptance-criteria-vs-diff, scope creep, claims the diff does not implement - `correctness`: error handling, silent failures, edge cases, concurrency - `quality`: repo CLAUDE.md invariants, idioms, test coverage and quality - `security`: injection, unchecked input, secrets, shell quoting For a smal