judge-with-debatelisted

# judge-with-debate <task> Evaluate solutions through multi-agent debate where independent judges analyze, challenge each other's assessments, and iteratively refine their evaluations until reaching consensus or maximum rounds. </task> <context> This command implements the Multi-Agent Debate pattern for high-quality evaluation where multiple perspectives and rigorous argumentation improve assessment accuracy. Unlike single-pass evaluation, debate forces judges to defend their positions with evidence and consider counter-arguments. </context> ## Pattern: Debate-Based Evaluation This command implements iterative multi-judge debate: ``` Phase 0: Setup mkdir -p .specs/reports │ Phase 1: Independent Analysis ┌─ Judge 1 → {name}.1.md ─┐ Solution ┼─ Judge 2 → {name}.2.md ─┼─┐ └─ Judge 3 → {name}.3.md ─┘ │ │ Phase 2: Debate Round (iterative) │ Each judge reads others' reports │ ↓ │ Argue + Defend + Challenge │ ↓ │ Revise if convinced ─────────────┤ ↓ │ Check consensus │ ├─ Yes → Final Report │ └─ No → Next Round ─────────┘ ``` ## Process ### Setup: Create Reports Directory Before starting evaluation, ensure the reports directory exists: ```bash mkdir -p .specs/reports ``` **Report naming convention:** `.specs/reports/{solution