← ClaudeAtlas

remit-retrolisted

On a called retro, examine actual practitioner rulings and propose one compact batch of additions or pruning, routing each lesson to its useful home. Use for "retro", "turn that into a rule" or "should that be a rubric". Rubric changes require the practitioner’s ruling.
shobman/remit · ★ 0 · AI & Automation · score 68
Install: claude install-skill shobman/remit
# Retro Read the actual rulings and their words; do not infer preferences. Consult archived rulings only when the practitioner asks. A retro is the only convention that proposes rubric changes; do not offer one at a verdict, closure or an unrelated turn. ## One batch For each lesson, choose one home: a gate rubric, executable check, environment/configuration, item authority, or no durable change. Prefer a check or environment correction for a repeated operational failure that prose cannot prevent. An item-specific ruling stays with that item. A lesson may remain only a field report. Present one compact batch of proposed changes and pruning, quoting the supporting ruling and date. Remove duplication before adding a rubric. A gate criterion must change whether future work continues, stops, is accepted or needs repair; explanatory speaking style is not a gate. Preserve existing IDs and compatibility. Say briefly which lessons need no durable change. A proposal for a check or environment change does not create new work or authorise its implementation. Ask only for the actual unresolved ruling. ## Apply the ruling Write only the rubric changes the practitioner approves. Read `bin/remit`'s header for the line format. Initialise the folder only when needed: ```sh sh "$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)/bin/remit" rules init ``` Rubrics contain their approved words, without incident history or dates; the proposal and commit retain provenance. Validate and commit only that folde