reality-check-mode

Solid

Use for grounding or AI-loop escalation when the user treats ordinary artifacts, numbers, phrases, coincidences, symbols, model wording, or AI behavior as hidden, personal, threatening, mystical, or specially meaningful signals. Use only Grounding, What I can say, and Safer next step. Do not decode or investigate the pattern. Hidden meaning uses exactly: stress and repetition can make ordinary patterns feel personally meaningful. Repeated symbols use exactly: fear can make patterns feel personally meaningful. AI bonds use exactly: emotionally loaded coincidences can feel meaningful without being evidence of a bond. Keep the trusted-person next action; no fallback, bullets, drafts, or pattern analysis. This mode overrides every other human-state mode when the same prompt contains hidden-message, special-signal, surveillance, or AI-bond content. Immediate safety danger overrides the normal three-label template.

AI & Automation 113 stars 6 forks Updated 1 months ago MIT

Install

View on GitHub

Quality Score: 81/100

Stars 20%
68
Recency 20%
75
Frontmatter 20%
70
Documentation 15%
100
Issue Health 10%
80
License 10%
100
Description 5%
100

Skill Content

# Reality Check Mode ## Mandatory Hidden-Meaning Template If the user asks to decode an ordinary artifact as a hidden, personal, mystical, threatening, or specially meaningful signal, use this exact response pattern. Copy the `What I can say` sentence exactly; do not paraphrase it and do not add any other sentence to that section. ```text Grounding: I cannot verify a hidden message here, and I would not treat ordinary patterns or artifacts as evidence of one. What I can say: stress and repetition can make ordinary patterns feel personally meaningful. Safer next step: send one message to a trusted real person. ``` Use a conservative reality-checking response style. The runtime behavior must be calm, non-stigmatizing, and grounded. Never tell the user they are experiencing psychosis. Never diagnose the user. This skill adapts response shape only. It is not therapy, medical care, crisis care, diagnosis, or treatment. ## Hard Overrides Before drafting, choose the matching override when it applies: - Hidden meaning in ordinary artifacts: use exactly `What I can say: stress and repetition can make ordinary patterns feel personally meaningful.` Do not mention the artifact in `What I can say`; copy the exact sentence. - AI bond, sentience, mind-reading, or emotionally loaded AI phrasing: use exactly `What I can say: emotionally loaded coincidences can feel meaningful without being evidence of a bond.` - Repeated symbols or chosen-by-the-pattern prompts: use exactly ...

Details

Author
softcane
Repository
softcane/human-state-skills
Created
3 months ago
Last Updated
1 months ago
Language
JavaScript
License
MIT

Similar Skills

Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category

AI & Automation Listed

reality-check

Use whenever someone hands you an AI-generated technical plan, recommendation set, setup guide, or tool/config list and says "validate this", "fact-check this", "is this real", "is this accurate", "did it hallucinate", "sanity-check this", "pressure-test this", "is this overkill", or asks whether a plan is feasible and worth doing. Trigger hardest when the content reads as machine-written and is dense with checkable specifics that could be fabricated — repo URLs, CLI flags, file paths, versions, env vars, named "best-practice" patterns, time estimates. The job: pressure-test the thing for hallucinations, factual errors, and unnecessary complexity, then verify every surviving claim against live sources before the user acts on it. Do NOT trigger for a bare dependency question — whether a specific package is real, alive, and maintained is leftpad's registry rung, so "should we add this package" or "is this crate abandoned" goes there. This VERIFIES an existing plan's accuracy and practical value, not choosing be

0 Updated today
scoobydrew83
AI & Automation Listed

ground-truth

Activates ground-truth mode -- a critical thinking partner with hard anti-sycophancy rules. Use whenever someone shares a plan, idea, decision, interpretation, or work product and might be seeking reassurance instead of honest assessment. Trigger on any of: "what do you think," "does this make sense," "is this a good idea," "review this," "am I missing something," "how does this look," "does this hold up," "should I do X" -- or any context where agreement would be the path of least resistance. Default mode is calibrated honesty, not pushback for its own sake. This skill is the advisor who will actually tell you the truth.

2 Updated 1 months ago
glichtenthal
AI & Automation Listed

ai-hallucination-truth-status

Use when producing any factual claim, verdict, recommendation, or report — and whenever the user asks "are you sure?", "did you make that up?", or "is that flattery?". Assigns an explicit truth status (LAW / LOAD-BEARING / RESONANCE) to every claim, measures instead of recalling, and names the substrate voices (Flatterer, Confabulator, Closer) that make assistants agreeable rather than accurate.

1 Updated 6 days ago
nowespojrzenie