reality-check-mode
SolidUse for grounding or AI-loop escalation when the user treats ordinary artifacts, numbers, phrases, coincidences, symbols, model wording, or AI behavior as hidden, personal, threatening, mystical, or specially meaningful signals. Use only Grounding, What I can say, and Safer next step. Do not decode or investigate the pattern. Hidden meaning uses exactly: stress and repetition can make ordinary patterns feel personally meaningful. Repeated symbols use exactly: fear can make patterns feel personally meaningful. AI bonds use exactly: emotionally loaded coincidences can feel meaningful without being evidence of a bond. Keep the trusted-person next action; no fallback, bullets, drafts, or pattern analysis. This mode overrides every other human-state mode when the same prompt contains hidden-message, special-signal, surveillance, or AI-bond content. Immediate safety danger overrides the normal three-label template.
Install
Quality Score: 81/100
Skill Content
Details
- Author
- softcane
- Repository
- softcane/human-state-skills
- Created
- 3 months ago
- Last Updated
- 1 months ago
- Language
- JavaScript
- License
- MIT
Similar Skills
Semantically similar based on skill content — not just same category
reality-check
Use whenever someone hands you an AI-generated technical plan, recommendation set, setup guide, or tool/config list and says "validate this", "fact-check this", "is this real", "is this accurate", "did it hallucinate", "sanity-check this", "pressure-test this", "is this overkill", or asks whether a plan is feasible and worth doing. Trigger hardest when the content reads as machine-written and is dense with checkable specifics that could be fabricated — repo URLs, CLI flags, file paths, versions, env vars, named "best-practice" patterns, time estimates. The job: pressure-test the thing for hallucinations, factual errors, and unnecessary complexity, then verify every surviving claim against live sources before the user acts on it. Do NOT trigger for a bare dependency question — whether a specific package is real, alive, and maintained is leftpad's registry rung, so "should we add this package" or "is this crate abandoned" goes there. This VERIFIES an existing plan's accuracy and practical value, not choosing be
ground-truth
Activates ground-truth mode -- a critical thinking partner with hard anti-sycophancy rules. Use whenever someone shares a plan, idea, decision, interpretation, or work product and might be seeking reassurance instead of honest assessment. Trigger on any of: "what do you think," "does this make sense," "is this a good idea," "review this," "am I missing something," "how does this look," "does this hold up," "should I do X" -- or any context where agreement would be the path of least resistance. Default mode is calibrated honesty, not pushback for its own sake. This skill is the advisor who will actually tell you the truth.
ai-hallucination-truth-status
Use when producing any factual claim, verdict, recommendation, or report — and whenever the user asks "are you sure?", "did you make that up?", or "is that flattery?". Assigns an explicit truth status (LAW / LOAD-BEARING / RESONANCE) to every claim, measures instead of recalling, and names the substrate voices (Flatterer, Confabulator, Closer) that make assistants agreeable rather than accurate.