← ClaudeAtlas

startup-grilllisted

Adversarially grill a startup IDEA or PITCH with a 5-seat panel of domain-aware probers (plus up to 3 domain specialists from team-composer), and ship a structured kill report ranked on two axes: severity (lethal vs material) and fixability (fixable vs unfixable). Use when the user says "grill my startup", "stress-test my pitch", "kill my idea", "pre-mortem my startup", "is this fundable", or uploads a one-pager / canvas / RAT plan / pitch deck for adversarial review. Use THIS, not `team-composer`, whenever the user wants an adversarial review with a verdict on a belief artifact, even if they say "review". CARVE-OUT: if the input is a BUILT product (a CODEBASE or live URL) that is `startup-audit`, even though they say "grill" or "kill". This skill reads BELIEF artifacts only (Lean Canvas, pitch deck, one-pager), never a codebase. Do NOT use for collaborative brainstorming, canvas construction, assumption-test design, or pitch-deck building (those route to the named constructive skills).
sorawit-w/agent-skills · ★ 1 · AI & Automation · score 75
Install: claude install-skill sorawit-w/agent-skills
# Startup Grill Adversarially probe a startup idea with a panel of domain-aware grillers. Ship a structured kill report. Optionally enter interactive defense mode. This skill is **not** a collaborative thinking partner. The job is to surface what would kill this startup if unaddressed — not to shape the idea, not to brainstorm next moves, not to be encouraging. If you want collaborative work, use `team-composer` instead. --- ## STOP — When NOT to use this skill Hand off to a different skill — do not run the grill — if any of these apply: - The user is **brainstorming** an idea or shaping a problem space → use `team-composer` (or `superpowers:brainstorming` if installed). - The user wants to **build** a validation canvas, brand identity, or pitch deck → use `validation-canvas`, `brand-workshop`, or `pitch-deck` respectively. Grilling can run *after* those exist. - The user wants to **design assumption tests** → use `riskiest-assumption-test`. Grilling exposes weaknesses; RAT designs experiments to test them. - The user wants **positioning review** or **brand voice review** → use `team-composer` with `@brand_strategist` / `@humorist` / `@senior_copywriter`. - The user wants to **review their plan** with a multi-perspective team that includes constructive feedback → use `team-composer` with `scope=review`. - The user is mid-deal and wants **investor diligence prep** rather than adversarial idea review → use `team-composer` with `@vc_partner` + `@finance_m