shipkit-review-directionlisted

# shipkit-review-direction - Direction Assessment **Purpose**: Read all direction artifacts and assess whether they are coherent, complete, and internally consistent. Write a structured assessment for the direction orchestrator. ## Input **Required artifacts** (the direction loop must produce all of these): - `.shipkit/why.json` (contains vision, purpose, stage) - `.shipkit/product-discovery.json` - `.shipkit/product-definition.json` - `.shipkit/engineering-definition.json` - `.shipkit/architecture.json` - `.shipkit/design-system/` (DIRECTION.md, PRINCIPLES.md, tokens/) - `.shipkit/goals/strategic.json` - `.shipkit/goals/product.json` - `.shipkit/goals/engineering.json` **Optional context** (read if present, don't flag as missing): - `.shipkit/metrics/latest.json` — only exists after implementation ## Coherence Checks 1. **Completeness**: Are ALL 9 required direction artifacts present with non-placeholder content? Missing artifacts are gaps. 2. **Vision coherence**: Does why.json state a vision that fulfills its stated purpose? (vision and purpose both live inside why.json) 3. **Goals ↔ Vision**: Do goals, if achieved, realize the vision stated in why.json? 4. **Goals ↔ Stage**: Are thresholds realistic for the current stage? Do all goals have rubrics? 5. **Internal consistency**: Do goals reference capabilities the vision describes? 6. **Architecture ↔ Engineering Definition**: Are architecture decisions consistent with the mechanisms and components defined? 7. **Desig